Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add lubochka/xiigen-general-skills --skill test-integritygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lubochka/xiigen-general-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lubochka/xiigen-general-skills/test-integrity)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lubochka/xiigen-general-skills/test-integrity"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lubochka/xiigen-general-skills/test-integrity/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lubochka/xiigen-general-skills/test-integrity"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lubochka/xiigen-general-skills/test-integrity.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.00168 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00084 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00034 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00017 |
Grade A, and why
test-integrity scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Test Integrity
Purpose
Keep tests meaningful and honest.
When to Use
Use when writing, changing, disabling, or interpreting tests.
Inputs
Test intent, assertions, fixtures, failures, target behavior.
Steps
- Confirm what behavior the test protects.
- Avoid weakening assertions to pass.
- Run targeted checks from the target project profile.
- Explain skipped tests and risks.
Gates
Tests validate behavior rather than hide failures.
Evidence
Relevant test output, assertion changes, and failure explanation.
Anti-Patterns
Deleting or weakening failing tests for a green result.
Related
integration-testing, e2e-test-matrix
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 34 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A a59403a59623
test-integrity is a skill published in the GitHub repository lubochka/xiigen-general-skills (1 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 168 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
agent-eval
Use when measuring whether an LLM or agent system actually got better and gating merges on it: golden sets, fixing an inflated LLM-as-judge, scoring RAG (faithfulness, contextual recall) or agent trajectories (tool correctness, completion), or picking an eval framework. NOT building the agent loop, tools or RAG…
accessibility-a11y
WCAG 2.2 compliance, ARIA patterns, keyboard navigation, screen readers, automated testing.
e2e-check
Run E2E tests or interactive browser verification. Triggers on: 'run e2e', 'e2e test', 'browser test', 'check in browser', 'verify UI', 'interactive test'.
verification-contract
Internal contract: one compact frozen ACCEPTANCE.md per delivery unit, its validation ladder, anti-weakening rules, and blob-bound execution receipt. Consumed by planners, execute-phase, and review-change.
pdlc-feature
An automated workflow for taking a new software feature from a description or requirements document through requirements, design, testing, implementation, review, and release preparation. It keeps one feature ID across the documents and requires tests before implementation.
pdlc-quality
A quality gate that runs configured coverage, end-to-end, and lint checks, compares their real results with declared targets, and creates a report for human approval.