Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/lucasheriques/shipmate/guide-writingnpx skills add lucasheriques/shipmate --skill guide-writinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lucasheriques/shipmateWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lucasheriques/shipmate/guide-writing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lucasheriques/shipmate/guide-writing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lucasheriques/shipmate/guide-writing.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00087 | $0.02061 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00044 | $0.01030 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00412 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00206 |
Grade A, and why
guide-writing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 74 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Guide writing (Write Useful Books method)
When to use
Use when structuring long-form educational content as a product with a promise: scoping it, ordering its contents, testing it on real readers, and planning its launch. This skill covers structure and product design of the content — voice and prose style are a separate concern, out of scope here. Only for problem-solvers (content promising an outcome); if the work is narrative, artistic, or entertainment-first, this method is explicitly the wrong advice.
The procedure
Phase 1 — Scope the promise (before writing anything)
- Write the scope in one block: Promise + Reader profile + Who it's NOT for + What it won't cover. The promise is what's different in the reader's life afterwards, stated clearly enough that the wrong reader can decide they don't need it.
- Sharpen by deletion, not addition. Ask: "What does my ideal reader already know and believe?" — everything they already believe gets cut. This kills introductory throat-clearing.
- Write the recommendation loop as a literal story: one stranger, in a specific moment of pain, complains to someone — who names your thing. If no plausible story exists, adjust the promise or reader until one does. No plausible story = the growth plan is "hope."
- Check longevity: is the promise relevant 5+ years out? Move datable tactics (tools, prices, platform mechanics) into an updatable channel (web page, appendix, changelog), not the core artifact.
- Validate desirability by talking, not pitching: run listening conversations about the reader's life — what they tried, where they searched, what blocked them. Never ask for opinions ("asking for opinions is just fishing for compliments"). If you can't find even one interested reader now, you won't find thousands later — fix the scope today.
Phase 2 — Design the ToC for the reader
- Every title is a takeaway, not a topic: "Good sales is about asking good questions", not "Sales 101". If a section has multiple learning outcomes, keep the category title and add takeaway subsections.
- Test the structure by teaching it live before drafting: walk a target reader through one or two chapters' worth of value in conversation. Every improvisation, repeat, or rephrase is a ToC bug — fix the structure, then teach again.
- Order content around the learner's goals, not the teacher's convenience. Theory is a value enabler, not value: interleave small doses of it between early wins instead of front-loading it ("let's get the theory out of the way" is the classic reader-experience killer).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 74 lines · 87 tokens per session scan A 46293dd38b66
guide-writing is a skill published in the GitHub repository lucasheriques/shipmate (4 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 87 tokens to every session and 2,061 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
solo-failures
Understand why startups fail — the most common failure modes, anti-patterns, and how to avoid them, backed by data from 101 founder interviews.
solo-roast
Get your startup plan roasted with data — Garry Tan style.
solo-analyze
Evaluate a startup idea against real patterns from 101 founder interviews.
solo-growth
Get data-backed growth and marketing recommendations for your business.
solo-patterns
Browse and search the startup pattern database (11 categories, 80+ patterns).
solo-playbook
Get a data-backed step-by-step playbook for any startup goal.