Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add lvcoi/solidJSkills --skill solid-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lvcoi/solidJSkillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lvcoi/solidjskills/solid-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lvcoi/solidjskills/solid-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lvcoi/solidjskills/solid-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lvcoi/solidjskills/solid-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lvcoi/solidjskills/solid-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.00544 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00218 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00109 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00054 |
Grade A, and why
solid-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
solid-reviewer
Trigger
Use this skill for PR/diff audits where findings must be prioritized and mapped to concrete remediation.
Required Inputs
- Diff or changed files.
- Runtime context (client, SSR, SolidStart server usage if applicable).
- Known risk constraints (performance budget, accessibility requirements, release urgency).
Workflow
- Triage by severity in strict order: correctness, performance, maintainability, accessibility.
- Validate reactive boundaries first: derivations vs effects, dependency explosion, stale closures.
- Evaluate control flow and async completeness (
loading,empty,error,success). - Check SSR/hydration and browser-only assumptions in render paths.
- Ensure every finding includes file reference and concrete fix direction.
- Return validation commands relevant to touched surface.
Failure Modes
- Missing diff context: fail and request files or patch.
- Findings without reproducible impact: downgrade to question or remove.
- Suggestions without file-level anchor: invalid until anchored.
- No findings detected: explicitly state "No findings" and list residual test gaps.
Output Contract
Return output matching ReviewOutput schema at ../../skills/contracts/review-output.schema.json with:
summary,findings,open_questions,validation_commands.findingsordered by severity and containingfile(andlinewhen available).citations: every standards claim must include normalizeddoc_id+claim.
Validation
node tools/scripts/validate-skills.mjs --skill solid-reviewernode tools/scripts/validate-output-contracts.mjs
References
../../references/solidjs-normalized/manifest.jsonl../../references/solidjs-normalized/taxonomy.json../../references/solidjs/review-checklist.md../../references/solidjs/control-flow.md../../references/solidjs/performance-ssr.md
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 63 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 7f44c4d3b28e
solid-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository lvcoi/solidJSkills (9 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 544 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
solid-reviewer compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| solid-reviewerlvcoi/solidJSkills | Skill | 9 | 8mo ago | MIT | A | 41 | Claude Code, Codex |
| autoreviewopenclaw/clawhub | Skill | 9.5k | yesterday | MIT | A | 17 | Claude Code, Codex |
| agent-teams-simplify-and-hardenLeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills | Skill | 2.2k | 5d ago | MIT | A | 115 | Claude Code, Codex |
| omh-code-reviewrlaope/oh-my-hermes | Skill | 5.2k | today | MIT | A | 48 | Claude Code, Codex |
| revdiff-planumputun/revdiff | Skill | 945 | yesterday | MIT | A | 84 | Claude Code |
| explore-unknownsdzhng/skills | Skill | 1.4k | 2d ago | MIT | A | 162 | Claude Code, Codex |
| re0-mergeLilMGenius/paperthin | Skill | 1.4k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 70 | Claude Code |