Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Lzy599775/agent-auto-sci-skills --skill literature-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Lzy599775/agent-auto-sci-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lzy599775/agent-auto-sci-skills/literature-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lzy599775/agent-auto-sci-skills/literature-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lzy599775/agent-auto-sci-skills/literature-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lzy599775/agent-auto-sci-skills/literature-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lzy599775/agent-auto-sci-skills/literature-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00082 | $0.02841 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00033 | $0.01136 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00568 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00284 |
Grade A, and why
literature-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 16d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
89% identical to literature-review — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 230 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Literature Review
Overview
Conduct systematic, comprehensive literature reviews following rigorous academic methodology. Search multiple literature databases, synthesize findings thematically, verify all citations for accuracy, and generate professional output documents in markdown and PDF formats.
Use discipline-appropriate bibliographic databases for the reproducible search, with parallel-web (parallel-cli search) for scoping and supplementary discovery. Ranked web results and extracted excerpts cannot establish exhaustive coverage or substitute for full-text assessment. Bundled scripts process normalized records, check DOI registration, and render documents; they do not run a complete systematic review automatically.
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when:
- Conducting a systematic literature review for research or publication
- Synthesizing current knowledge on a specific topic across multiple sources
- Performing meta-analysis or scoping reviews
- Writing the literature review section of a research paper or thesis
- Investigating the state of the art in a research domain
- Identifying research gaps and future directions
- Requiring verified citations and professional formatting
Figures and PRISMA reporting
For systematic reviews, use the appropriate PRISMA 2020 flow template and reconciled screening counts. Distinguish records, reports, and studies, including reports not retrieved and reasons for full-text exclusions. Use tables or deterministic plotting for exact numbers, effect estimates, and risk-of-bias results.
Conceptual schematics are optional. The bundled generator needs OPENROUTER_API_KEY and creates a PNG draft with up to two generation/review iterations:
python scripts/generate_schematic.py "Conceptual evidence map; labels from the reviewed extraction table" \
-o figures/evidence_map.png --doc-type journal --iterations 2
Generation uses OpenRouter's POST /api/v1/images with
google/gemini-3.1-flash-image; review uses POST /api/v1/chat/completions with
google/gemini-3.7-flash. The output path must end in .png. Inspect labels,
counts, arrows, and accessibility yourself: success means an image was saved,
whereas quality_met, final_reviewed, and termination_reason in the review
log describe the automated review. Neither proves scientific accuracy. A failed
refinement preserves the previous draft. Check current model availability before
running paid generation; do not fabricate study counts in an image prompt.
What ships with it
11 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- assets/review_template.md 13 KB
- references/citation_styles.md 7.4 KB
- references/core_workflow.md 12 KB
- references/database_strategies.md 10 KB
- references/example_workflow.md 3.0 KB
- references/search_and_citation.md 4.6 KB
- scripts/generate_pdf.py 4.9 KB runs code
- scripts/generate_schematic_ai.py 35 KB runs code
- scripts/generate_schematic.py 7.6 KB runs code
- scripts/search_databases.py 8.6 KB runs code
- scripts/verify_citations.py 9.7 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 16d ago Changed · -51 lines · -4 tokens per session scan C → A 16a9e85bcdcb
- 1mo ago Changed · +17 lines 950a6d0863ef
- 1mo ago First seen · 264 lines · 86 tokens per session scan C bb80853650e9
literature-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Lzy599775/agent-auto-sci-skills (2 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 82 tokens to every session and 2,841 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 89% identical to literature-review, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
openalex
A skill for searching OpenAlex, a free catalog of research papers, authors, institutions, journals, and research topics.
papers-reading-skill
Evidence-grounded AI research workflow for turning supplied economics, finance, management, and social-science papers or structured records into versioned PaperReading artifacts. Use when Codex must ingest text, Markdown, or a text-based PDF; separate source-grounded claims from researcher analysis; bind findings to…
paper-research-mentor
A research-paper reading guide for understanding one or more academic papers in depth. It provides explanations linked to the source, discusses equations and experiments, and connects methods to new projects.
ref-downloader
Use when the user asks to batch-download academic PDFs with ref-downloader — either ALL references of one paper (Mode A: DOI or PDF input), OR a custom batch of papers (Mode B: DOI/title/arXiv-PMID list, or abstract query like "Author X's recent papers"). Not for one-off PDFs, paper search, or Zotero import.
scopus-researcher
Expert academic researcher using the Scopus MCP. Finds papers, retrieves full abstracts, builds author profiles, analyzes citation impact, and constructs advanced Boolean queries across the Elsevier Scopus database. Activate when asked to search for academic papers, analyze research trends, find citations, profile…
write-literature-review
Iterative literature-review workflow for a research topic. Use this skill to draft up to 10 search keywords, build a seed set from OpenAlex title-and-abstract matches, expand by backward and forward citations, screen candidates by title and abstract, repeat until no new relevant papers remain, rank the final set…