Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Zsun79/LitReviewSkill --skill write-literature-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Zsun79/LitReviewSkillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zsun79/litreviewskill/write-literature-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zsun79/litreviewskill/write-literature-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zsun79/litreviewskill/write-literature-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zsun79/litreviewskill/write-literature-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zsun79/litreviewskill/write-literature-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00095 | $0.01178 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00038 | $0.00471 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00236 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00118 |
Grade A, and why
write-literature-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
13 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- agents/openai.yaml 238 B
- references/citation format/APA.md 846 B
- references/citation format/Chicago Author-Date.md 903 B
- references/citation format/Harvard.md 938 B
- references/citation format/IEEE.md 808 B
- references/citation format/MLA.md 723 B
- references/citation format/Vancouver.md 748 B
- references/review_template.md 2.2 KB
- references/review_writing.md 4.0 KB
- references/workflow_logging.md 3.2 KB
- references/workflow.md 8.7 KB
- scripts/build_knowledge_graph.py 7.7 KB runs code
- scripts/lit_review_pipeline.py 30 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 107 lines · 95 tokens per session scan A 4ff79cbfd14b
write-literature-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Zsun79/LitReviewSkill (27 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 95 tokens to every session and 1,178 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
kelly-dog-walk
A dog-walking agent workflow that chooses a daily walking time from a rulebook and checks the decision against real weather data. Changes to the rulebook are submitted for a person to approve rather than applied directly.
self-review
Use when checking your own manuscript before submission from a reviewer's perspective. Returns anticipated Major/Minor comments with fixes, including numerical, citation and leakage checks, with an optional multi-reviewer panel. Someone else's paper is /peer-review.
check-reporting
Use when auditing a manuscript item by item against a reporting guideline or risk-of-bias tool. Covers 49 reporting guidelines and risk-of-bias tools (STROBE, CONSORT, STARD, TRIPOD+AI, PRISMA, QUADAS and more), marking each item PRESENT, PARTIAL or MISSING. Not a reviewer critique (/self-review).
make-figures
Use when a paper needs publication-ready figures or a visual abstract. Makes ROC, forest, calibration, Kaplan-Meier and Bland-Altman plots, CONSORT/STARD/PRISMA flow diagrams, confusion matrices, pipeline diagrams and journal visual abstracts, checking the journal's AI-image policy first.
meta-analysis
Use when running a systematic review and meta-analysis, DTA or intervention. Covers PROSPERO protocol, search, screening, extraction, risk of bias (QUADAS-3, RoB 2, ROBINS-I), bivariate/HSROC or random-effects pooling, forest plots, heterogeneity and PRISMA reporting. Topic scouting is /ma-scout.
present-paper
Use when preparing an academic talk such as a journal club, grand rounds, seminar, conference presentation, or lecture/teaching deck. Analyzes the source, drafts audience-adapted speaker scripts, builds or augments the PPTX with speaker notes and prepares Q&A.