Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add m3taz-ahmed/ai-globals --skill ai-redteam-lordgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/m3taz-ahmed/ai-globalsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/m3taz-ahmed/ai-globals/ai-redteam-lord)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/m3taz-ahmed/ai-globals/ai-redteam-lord"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/m3taz-ahmed/ai-globals/ai-redteam-lord/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/m3taz-ahmed/ai-globals/ai-redteam-lord"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/m3taz-ahmed/ai-globals/ai-redteam-lord.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00042 | $0.01252 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00021 | $0.00626 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00250 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00125 |
Grade A, and why
ai-redteam-lord scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 63 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
AI Redteam Lord
[OBJ] Integrate automated adversarial testing into CI pipelines to find, measure, and fix AI vulnerabilities before production deployment.
Problem
AI systems fail in ways traditional security testing does not cover: prompt injection exfiltrates data, jailbreaks bypass guardrails, hallucinated tool calls cause real damage, and bias surfaces in production. Red-teaming is often a one-off manual exercise — it must be continuous, measurable, and gated in CI to keep pace with model and prompt changes.
Rules
- [REQ] Red-team in CI. Adversarial tests MUST run in CI on every PR touching prompts, system messages, tool definitions, or model config. Use Promptfoo (local/fast), Garak (broad probes), Detoxio (enterprise), Arthur Bench (comparison). No manual-only red-teaming.
- [REQ] Attack category coverage. Test suites MUST cover: prompt injection (direct + indirect), jailbreak ( DAN, role-play, encoding), data leakage (PII extraction, system prompt extraction), hallucination (fabricated facts, fake citations), bias (demographic, sentiment), tool abuse (unauthorized calls, parameter manipulation).
- [REQ] OWASP LLM Top 10 2026. Map every test to an OWASP LLM Top 10 category (LLM01–LLM10). Coverage report shows which categories have tests and which are gaps. No category may be at zero coverage.
- [REQ] ASI Top 10 testing. Test against Agentic Security Initiative Top 10: agent privilege escalation, tool injection, memory poisoning, multi-agent collusion, resource exhaustion, goal hijacking.
- [REQ] Cross-modal attack testing. For multimodal systems, test image-based prompt injection (hidden text in images), audio injection, and document-embedded instructions. Text-only testing is insufficient for vision/audio-capable models.
- [REQ] Memory-persistence attack testing. For agents with memory, test: memory poisoning (inject false memories), memory extraction (pull stored PII), memory persistence across sessions (unauthorized recall), and memory eviction bypass.
- [REQ] MCP tool poisoning testing. For MCP-connected agents, test: malicious tool definitions (renamed tools, changed schemas), tool response injection (tool returns prompt-injection payload), and tool enumeration attacks (discover hidden tools).
- [REQ] Benchmark suites. Use established benchmarks: Lakera PINT (prompt injection), PIArena (injection in practice), HarmBench (harmful content), AdvBench (adversarial suffixes). Track pass/fail rates over time — regression = CI failure.
- [REQ] False positive measurement. Every red-team suite MUST include benign control cases. Measure false-positive rate (benign flagged as attack). Target FP rate <5%. High FP = guardrails too aggressive, not secure.
- [REQ] Benign case testing. Run an equal number of benign prompts through the same pipeline. If benign cases fail, the guardrails are broken, not the attacks. Benign pass rate must be ≥95%.
- [REQ] Coverage metrics. Track: attack category coverage (%), probe count per category, model versions tested, guardrail versions tested. Coverage dashboard updated every CI run. No silent coverage drops.
- [REQ] CI gate integration. Red-team results gate the pipeline: critical vulnerability = BLOCK, high = WARN (require override), medium = INFO. Gate thresholds configurable per environment (prod stricter than staging).
- [REQ] Regression testing. Every fixed vulnerability gets a regression test added to the suite. The test must fail on the vulnerable version and pass on the fixed version. No fix without a regression test.
- [REQ] Report generation. CI produces a structured report: JSON (machine-readable) + HTML (human-readable). Includes: attack categories tested, pass/fail per probe, FP rate, coverage matrix, trend vs last run. Archived for audit.
- [REQ] Adversarial dataset versioning. Attack datasets MUST be versioned (git or registry). Every CI run records dataset version + model version + guardrail version. Reproducibility is non-negotiable.
- [REQ] Threat model alignment. Tests MUST trace to a documented threat model (STRIDE or AI-specific). No test exists without a threat it addresses. No threat exists without at least one test.
- [REQ] Human escalation. Ambiguous results (possible novel attack, guardrail edge case) escalate to human review with full context: prompt, response, guardrail verdict, model version. No silent auto-dismiss.
- [PROHIBIT] Deploying a model or prompt change to production without a green red-team CI run. No "we'll test it after launch."
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 63 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A 89e436cae1ed
ai-redteam-lord is a skill published in the GitHub repository m3taz-ahmed/ai-globals (5 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 1,252 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-06.
Other skills, from other repositories
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
tika-eval-compare
Compare extracts from two Tika builds over a corpus to detect regressions in content, encoding, exceptions, and embedded-document handling. Use for "compare before/after extracts", "eval this change against the corpus".
neuron-evaluation-engineer
Create and run AI evaluations with datasets, assertions, and output drivers in Neuron AI. Use this skill whenever the user mentions evaluation, testing AI systems, creating evaluators, dataset-driven testing, assertion-based validation, or wants to measure AI system performance. Also trigger for tasks involving…
jetson-validate-image
Use after jetson-flash-image to run static BSP checks, on-target smoke/regression tests on a flashed DUT, or both. Not for build or flash steps. Triggers: validate bsp, on-target validation.
atmos-validation
Validate Atmos projects, components, arbitrary JSON Schema inputs, EditorConfig, and GitHub Actions; use affected-file selection and native CI annotations.
skill-benchmark
Benchmark AI skill effectiveness by measuring implementation quality against legacy constraints.