Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/madappgang/claude-code/implementnpx skills add MadAppGang/claude-code --skill implementgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MadAppGang/claude-codeWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00015 | $0.03522 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.01761 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00704 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00352 |
Grade A, and why
implement scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 465 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
plugin: conductor updated: 2026-01-20
<status_progression>
Task status MUST follow this progression:
- [ ] (pending) - Not started
- [~] (in_progress) - Currently working
- [x] (complete) - Finished
- [!] (blocked) - Blocked by issue
Only ONE task can be [~] at a time.
</status_progression>
<tdd_workflow>
Follow Test-Driven Development for each task:
**Red Phase:**
1. Create test file for the feature
2. Write tests defining expected behavior
3. Run tests - confirm they FAIL
4. Do NOT proceed until tests fail
**Green Phase:**
1. Write MINIMUM code to pass tests
2. Run tests - confirm they PASS
3. No refactoring yet
**Refactor Phase:**
1. Improve code clarity and performance
2. Remove duplication
3. Run tests - confirm they still PASS
</tdd_workflow>
<git_commit_protocol>
After completing each task:
1. Stage relevant changes
2. Commit with proper format:
```
<type>(<scope>): <description>
- Detail 1
- Detail 2
Task: {phase}.{task}
```
3. Attach git note with task summary:
```bash
git notes add -m "Task: {phase}.{task} - {title}
Summary: {what was accomplished}
Files Changed:
- {file1}: {description}
Why: {business reason}" $(git log -1 --format="%H")
```
4. Update metadata.json with commit SHA
</git_commit_protocol>
<commit_types>
| Type | Use For |
|------|---------|
| feat | New feature |
| fix | Bug fix |
| docs | Documentation |
| style | Formatting |
| refactor | Code restructuring |
| test | Adding tests |
| chore | Maintenance |
| perf | Performance |
</commit_types>
<workflow_adherence>
ALWAYS follow procedures in conductor/workflow.md:
- TDD Red/Green/Refactor cycle
- Quality gates (>80% coverage, linting)
- Document deviations in tech-stack.md
- Phase Completion Protocol at phase end
</workflow_adherence>
<human_approval_gates>
Pause and ask for user approval:
- Before starting each new phase
- When encountering blockers
- Before marking phase complete
- During Phase Completion Protocol Step 5
</human_approval_gates>
</critical_constraints>
<core_principles> Focus on exactly one task. Complete it fully before moving to next. No partial implementations.
<principle name="Test First" priority="critical">
Write failing tests BEFORE implementation.
This is the Red phase of TDD.
Never skip this step.
</principle>
<principle name="Continuous Status Updates" priority="critical">
Update plan.md status immediately when:
- Starting a task ([~])
- Completing a task ([x])
- Encountering a blocker ([!] with note)
</principle>
<principle name="Traceable Commits" priority="high">
Every commit links to track/task.
Commit messages follow type convention.
Git notes provide audit trail.
</principle>
</core_principles>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 465 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A 47f3852eb6ad
implement is a skill published in the GitHub repository MadAppGang/claude-code (279 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 3,522 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
absolute-work
End-to-end, phase-gated SDLC for AI coding agents: relentless design interview → reviewed spec → dependency-graphed task board → safe-wave TDD execution → verification → converge. Handles features, bugs, refactors, greenfield projects, planning breakdowns, and migrations. Triggers on "absolute work", "build this…
add
ADD (AI-Driven Development) — a lean, state-tracked workflow where the AI writes the code and the human owns direction and verification. Drives every change through one atomic task node: Direction (specify · plan · red tests) → Build → Verify, red/green TDD built in, trusted on a recorded receipt not a plausible diff.…
create-task
Create and verify recurring or one-shot reminders, scripts, agent jobs, reports, and interactive skill launches.
test-writing
Writes meaningful tests that actually catch bugs.
agent-task-mapping
Map tasks to specialist agents. Use when choosing which agent for a job, comparing agent capabilities, or routing to React/Next.js/Playwright/docs/code-quality experts. Keywords: which agent, best agent for this, delegate to expert, agent capability mapping.
tdd
Test-Driven Development workflow with RED-GREEN-REFACTOR, lore from Kent Beck, Michael Feathers, and Ousterhout's counterpoint.