Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add MadAppGang/magus/plugin install devWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/madappgang/magus/universal-patterns)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/madappgang/magus/universal-patterns"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/madappgang/magus/universal-patterns/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/madappgang/magus/universal-patterns"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/madappgang/magus/universal-patterns.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.02389 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00956 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00478 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00239 |
Grade A, and why
universal-patterns scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 22d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 324 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Universal Development Patterns
Overview
Language-agnostic development patterns and best practices applicable across all technology stacks.
The deep catalog lives next door — read it for any real design decision
This file is the quick reference. It carries enough to keep everyday code honest. It is deliberately shallow on architecture, and it contains none of the 22 GoF design patterns.
For anything beyond a reminder — choosing a style, comparing two, or picking a design
pattern — read the architecture skill's index, then follow where it routes you:
<dev-plugin-root>/skills/architecture/SKILL.md
Locate it relative to this plugin's root, which covers both the installed-cache and local-source layouts:
ls "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/architecture/SKILL.md" 2>/dev/null \
|| ls "$(dirname "$(dirname "$(pwd)")")"/plugins/dev/skills/architecture/SKILL.md 2>/dev/null
That index routes in two steps: altitude first (is this about system shape or class collaboration), then the specific file. What it covers, none of which is below:
| Tier | Files | Contents |
|---|---|---|
| Architectural styles | references/styles/*.md |
layered, hexagonal (ports and adapters), clean, modular monolith, microservices, event-driven, CQRS + event sourcing |
| GoF categories | references/{creational,structural,behavioral}.md |
the shared framing for each family |
| GoF patterns | references/patterns/*.md |
all 22, with TypeScript, trade-offs, and when not to use each |
| Selection | references/selection.md |
how to choose, overuse smells, and where TypeScript already gives you the pattern free |
Answer architecture questions from those files: they carry the trade-offs and failure modes that decide whether a choice is right.
Code Organization Principles
Single Responsibility
Each module/function should do ONE thing well.
// BAD: Multiple responsibilities
function processUser(user) {
validateUser(user);
saveToDatabase(user);
sendEmail(user);
logAnalytics(user);
}
// GOOD: Single responsibility
function validateUser(user) { /* validation only */ }
function saveUser(user) { /* persistence only */ }
function notifyUser(user) { /* notification only */ }
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 22d ago Changed · -53 lines 1280b01bd041
- 1mo ago Changed dbedcce6ce77
- 1mo ago First seen · 377 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A 5cb7c0b30140
universal-patterns is a skill published in the GitHub repository MadAppGang/magus (13 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 2,389 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.
omh-code-review
This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
asplos-writing-style
Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…
explore-unknowns
Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…
re0-merge
Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…