Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add magnus919/agent-skills --skill interviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/magnus919/agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/magnus919/agent-skills/interviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/magnus919/agent-skills/interviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/magnus919/agent-skills/interviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/magnus919/agent-skills/interviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/magnus919/agent-skills/interviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Agent Snooping · line 150 Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00046 | $0.01769 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00885 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00354 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00177 |
Grade A, and why
interviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 198 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Interviewer — Active Workflow Discovery
This is the core of workflow-architect's active interrogation mode. It runs a structured but adaptive conversation with the user to discover how they work.
State Model
The interview builds a structured representation of the user's workflow.
State is stored via the memory tool with the prefix
workflow-architect:state: so it survives across turns.
state:
entry_points: [] # How sessions start
phases: [] # Distinct phases discovered
- name: string
description: string
typical_tools: []
typical_openers: [] # What user says to enter this phase
typical_exits: [] # What user says to leave this phase
branching: [] # Decisions and what drives them
pain_points: []
exit_criteria: [] # How sessions end
archetype: null # Best match from workflow-archetypes
convergence_score: 0 # 0.0 to 1.0 — enough to generate bundle?
Question Progression
The interview follows a branching script. Each answer feeds the state model and determines the next probe. Do not ask all questions sequentially — adapt based on what the user has already told you.
Phase 1: Session Opener (1-2 questions)
Start broad. The goal is to understand the user's self-model of their workflow.
Agent: "Walk me through a typical session from the very start.
What's the first thing you do when you open this agent?"
User: "I usually check my task list, see what's urgent, and jump into the
most pressing issue."
Agent: [Records entry point: "check task list, prioritize by urgency"]
[Probes for structure: "After that initial triage — what happens
next? Does the session settle into a rhythm?"]
Alternative openers (pick one based on the user's stated context):
- "Describe a session that went really well. What did it look like from start to finish?"
- "What does a typical day look like, broken into sessions?"
- "If I looked at your last 10 sessions, what patterns would I see?"
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 198 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A 59be53d15b8b
interviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository magnus919/agent-skills (75 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 1,769 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-05.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…
next-cache-components-optimizer
Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…
next-partial-prefetching-adoption
Turn on Partial Prefetching in a Next.js app and work through the insights it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable or adopt Partial Prefetching, flip the partialPrefetching flag, opt routes in with export const prefetch = 'partial', audit Link prefetch={true} behavior, preserve existing prefetched UI with…