Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add majiang213/OpenClaw-MAS --skill cmd_gan_buildgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/majiang213/OpenClaw-MASWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/majiang213/openclaw-mas/cmd_gan_build)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/majiang213/openclaw-mas/cmd_gan_build"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/majiang213/openclaw-mas/cmd_gan_build/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/majiang213/openclaw-mas/cmd_gan_build"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/majiang213/openclaw-mas/cmd_gan_build.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.00400 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00200 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00080 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00040 |
Grade A, and why
cmd_gan_build scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- cmd_gan_design — 89% identical, 23 lines differ
What it actually says
Run specialist agents in sequence: gan-planner → gan-generator → gan-evaluator.
Include in the task payload:
- Project path (the absolute path the user provided as the first argument)
- The user's full request and build/design brief
- Any flags or configuration options (max iterations, pass threshold, etc.)
- Relevant codebase context
Execute specialist agents in sequence: gan-planner → gan-generator → gan-evaluator
- Reply to the user briefly, then call sessions_spawn:
{
"agentId": "gan-planner",
"sessionKey": "gan-planner",
"task": "<task description with full context from previous step>",
"runTimeoutSeconds": 0
}
Wait for this agent to complete before proceeding.
- Reply to the user briefly, then call sessions_spawn:
{
"agentId": "gan-generator",
"sessionKey": "gan-generator",
"task": "<task description with full context from previous step>",
"runTimeoutSeconds": 0
}
Wait for this agent to complete before proceeding.
- Reply to the user briefly, then call sessions_spawn:
{
"agentId": "gan-evaluator",
"sessionKey": "gan-evaluator",
"task": "<task description with full context from previous step>",
"runTimeoutSeconds": 0
}
Wait for this agent to complete before proceeding.
Do not spawn the next agent until the current one completes. Do not spawn agents in parallel. After all agents complete, return the final result to the user.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 58 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A c9048003b198
cmd_gan_build is a skill published in the GitHub repository majiang213/OpenClaw-MAS (5 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 400 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
jupyter-live-kernel
Use a live Jupyter kernel for stateful, iterative Python execution via hamelnb. Load this skill when the task involves exploration, iteration, or inspecting intermediate results — data science, ML experimentation, API exploration, or building up complex code step-by-step. Uses terminal to run CLI commands against a…
audit-training-experiment
Audits an ML training experiment for reproducibility, evidence integrity, leakage, checkpoint identity, evaluation validity, and overclaimed conclusions. Use before accepting results, spending on a longer run, publishing artifacts, or handing work to another agent.
close-out-ml-experiment
Preserves positive or negative ML experiment evidence, reconciles report discrepancies, records the canonical decision and limitations, and prepares a concise handoff. Use when stopping an experiment, rejecting a prompt/model, or freezing a result before the next iteration.
ehr-analysis
End-to-end EHR predictive modeling pipeline with PyHealth, covering dataset loading, task definition, model training, evaluation, calibration, and clinical interpretation.
scrna-preprocessing-clustering
Standard scRNA-seq preprocessing and clustering with Scanpy. Use for QC, normalization, HVG selection, PCA, neighbor graph construction, UMAP, Leiden clustering, and export of an analysis-ready AnnData object.
bindcraft
End-to-end binder design using BindCraft hallucination. Use this skill when: (1) Designing protein binders with built-in AF2 validation, (2) Running production-quality binder campaigns, (3) Using different design protocols (fast, default, slow), (4) Need joint backbone and sequence optimization, (5) Want high…