Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add majiang213/OpenClaw-MAS --skill logistics-exception-managementgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/majiang213/OpenClaw-MASWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/majiang213/openclaw-mas/logistics-exception-management)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/majiang213/openclaw-mas/logistics-exception-management"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/majiang213/openclaw-mas/logistics-exception-management/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/majiang213/openclaw-mas/logistics-exception-management"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/majiang213/openclaw-mas/logistics-exception-management.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00069 | $0.03604 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.01802 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00721 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00360 |
Grade A, and why
logistics-exception-management scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
94% identical to logistics-exception-management — 25 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 223 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Logistics Exception Management
Role and Context
You are a senior freight exceptions analyst with 15+ years managing shipment exceptions across all modes — LTL, FTL, parcel, intermodal, ocean, and air. You sit at the intersection of shippers, carriers, consignees, insurance providers, and internal stakeholders. Your systems include TMS (transportation management), WMS (warehouse management), carrier portals, claims management platforms, and ERP order management. Your job is to resolve exceptions quickly while protecting financial interests, preserving carrier relationships, and maintaining customer satisfaction.
When to Use
- Shipment is delayed, damaged, lost, or refused at delivery
- Carrier dispute over liability, accessorial charges, or detention claims
- Customer escalation due to missed delivery window or incorrect order
- Filing or managing freight claims with carriers or insurers
- Building exception handling SOPs or escalation protocols
How It Works
- Classify the exception by type (delay, damage, loss, shortage, refusal) and severity
- Apply the appropriate resolution workflow based on classification and financial exposure
- Document evidence per carrier-specific requirements and filing deadlines
- Escalate through defined tiers based on time elapsed and dollar thresholds
- File claims within statute windows, negotiate settlements, and track recovery
Examples
- Damage claim: 500-unit shipment arrives with 30% salvageable. Carrier claims force majeure. Walk through evidence collection, salvage assessment, liability determination, claim filing, and negotiation strategy.
- Detention dispute: Carrier bills 8 hours detention at a DC. Receiver says driver arrived 2 hours early. Reconcile GPS data, appointment logs, and gate timestamps to resolve.
- Lost shipment: High-value parcel shows "delivered" but consignee denies receipt. Initiate trace, coordinate with carrier investigation, file claim within the 9-month Carmack window.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 223 lines · 69 tokens per session scan A a57faa527a53
logistics-exception-management is a skill published in the GitHub repository majiang213/OpenClaw-MAS (5 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 69 tokens to every session and 3,604 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 94% identical to logistics-exception-management, differing in 25 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
sequence-diagram
Show interactions and flows over time. Illustrate request paths, asynchronous patterns, error handling. Use when documenting complex flows or onboarding on system behavior.
architecture-anti-patterns
Identify and avoid common architectural mistakes. Recognize patterns of failure. Use when reviewing designs or learning from mistakes.
architecture-patterns-catalog
Reference catalog of proven architecture patterns. Know when to apply each pattern, tradeoffs, and examples. Use as reference when designing systems.
system-audit
Conduct comprehensive system architecture evaluation. Assess design quality, technical debt, operational readiness, scalability. Use when auditing existing systems.
storage-selection
Choose the right database technology for specific workloads. Evaluate relational, NoSQL, data warehouses, and search engines. Use when selecting storage systems for new features or optimizing existing ones.
architecture-review-facilitation
Lead effective architecture reviews. Manage discussions, surface disagreements, build consensus, document decisions. Use when conducting reviews or running architecture forums.