regex-vs-llm-structured-text

regex-vs-llm-structured-text is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from majiang213/OpenClaw-MAS. It costs 38 tokens per session (1,594 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of regex-vs-llm-structured-text, MIT.

A decision guide for extracting repeating structures from text with regular expressions before using an LLM. It explains when a fixed pattern is reliable and when an LLM should handle unusual cases.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it for quizzes, forms, invoices, tables, and other structured text, including confidence checks and hybrid regex-plus-LLM pipelines.
Why use it?
It avoids sending every document to a slower or costlier language model when simpler, predictable parsing is enough, while still covering messy edge cases.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it for quizzes, forms, invoices, tables, and other structured text, including confidence checks and hybrid regex-plus-LLM pipelines.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/majiang213/openclaw-mas/regex-vs-llm-structured-text
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add majiang213/OpenClaw-MAS --skill regex-vs-llm-structured-text
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/majiang213/OpenClaw-MAS

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for regex-vs-llm-structured-text

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/majiang213/openclaw-mas/regex-vs-llm-structured-text/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/majiang213/openclaw-mas/regex-vs-llm-structured-text)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/majiang213/openclaw-mas/regex-vs-llm-structured-text"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/majiang213/openclaw-mas/regex-vs-llm-structured-text/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for regex-vs-llm-structured-text

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/majiang213/openclaw-mas/regex-vs-llm-structured-text"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/majiang213/openclaw-mas/regex-vs-llm-structured-text.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 38 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,594 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 95% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00038 $0.01594
Opus 5 $0.00019 $0.00797
Sonnet 5 $0.00008 $0.00319
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00159

Measured 8d ago against content hash 1f4338a9d8ee, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

regex-vs-llm-structured-text scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

95% identical to regex-vs-llm-structured-text — 9 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

ecc-skills/regex-vs-llm-structured-text/SKILL.md · 221 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 221 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Regex vs LLM for Structured Text Parsing

A practical decision framework for parsing structured text (quizzes, forms, invoices, documents). The key insight: regex handles 95-98% of cases cheaply and deterministically. Reserve expensive LLM calls for the remaining edge cases.

When to Activate

  • Parsing structured text with repeating patterns (questions, forms, tables)
  • Deciding between regex and LLM for text extraction
  • Building hybrid pipelines that combine both approaches
  • Optimizing cost/accuracy tradeoffs in text processing

Decision Framework

Is the text format consistent and repeating?
├── Yes (>90% follows a pattern) → Start with Regex
│   ├── Regex handles 95%+ → Done, no LLM needed
│   └── Regex handles <95% → Add LLM for edge cases only
└── No (free-form, highly variable) → Use LLM directly

Architecture Pattern

Source Text
    │
    ▼
[Regex Parser] ─── Extracts structure (95-98% accuracy)
    │
    ▼
[Text Cleaner] ─── Removes noise (markers, page numbers, artifacts)
    │
    ▼
[Confidence Scorer] ─── Flags low-confidence extractions
    │
    ├── High confidence (≥0.95) → Direct output
    │
    └── Low confidence (<0.95) → [LLM Validator] → Output

Implementation

1. Regex Parser (Handles the Majority)

import re
from dataclasses import dataclass

@dataclass(frozen=True)
class ParsedItem:
    id: str
    text: str
    choices: tuple[str, ...]
    answer: str
    confidence: float = 1.0

def parse_structured_text(content: str) -> list[ParsedItem]:
    """Parse structured text using regex patterns."""
    pattern = re.compile(
        r"(?P<id>\d+)\.\s*(?P<text>.+?)\n"
        r"(?P<choices>(?:[A-D]\..+?\n)+)"
        r"Answer:\s*(?P<answer>[A-D])",
        re.MULTILINE | re.DOTALL,
    )
    items = []
    for match in pattern.finditer(content):
        choices = tuple(
            c.strip() for c in re.findall(r"[A-D]\.\s*(.+)", match.group("choices"))
        )
        items.append(ParsedItem(
            id=match.group("id"),
            text=match.group("text").strip(),
            choices=choices,
            answer=match.group("answer"),
        ))
    return items

Read the full file on GitHub · 221 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago First seen · 221 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A 1f4338a9d8ee

Subscribe to this mod's changes

regex-vs-llm-structured-text is a skill published in the GitHub repository majiang213/OpenClaw-MAS (5 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 1,594 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 95% identical to regex-vs-llm-structured-text, differing in 9 lines, and is treated as a copy.