Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Makiya1202/ai-agents-skills --skill owasp-securitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Makiya1202/ai-agents-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/makiya1202/ai-agents-skills/owasp-security)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/makiya1202/ai-agents-skills/owasp-security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/makiya1202/ai-agents-skills/owasp-security/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/makiya1202/ai-agents-skills/owasp-security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/makiya1202/ai-agents-skills/owasp-security.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00057 | $0.03567 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.01784 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00713 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00357 |
Grade B, and why
owasp-security scanned grade B with 3 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Recursive force deletemediumDestructive command
rm -rf with a variable or a broad path is one typo away from removing the wrong tree.
exec(`convert ${userInput} output.png`); // userInput: "; rm -rf /" Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
const response = await fetch(url); Runs shell commandslowCapability
Expected in a hook, worth knowing in a rule or an instructions file.
import { execFile } from 'child_process'; The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 537 lines · 57 tokens per session scan B c73880511ba4
owasp-security is a skill published in the GitHub repository Makiya1202/ai-agents-skills (2 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 57 tokens to every session and 3,567 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it B with 3 findings (recursive force delete, makes network calls, runs shell commands). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
method-enterprise-builder-planning
Orchestrate the full enterprise software planning methodology. Activates the 8-phase planning cycle for mission-critical, high-availability, and enterprise-grade systems. Integrates Method Modular Design (Core + Packs) with PDCA-T quality cycle.
plan-enterprise
Complete 8-phase enterprise software planning cycle for mission-critical systems.
phase-5-adr
Phase 5 — Architecture Decisions with ADR generation and validation.
phase-7-testing
Phase 7 — Test Strategy with pyramid, coverage gates, load tests, and Critical User Journeys.
lint-microtask
Validate that a code file complies with the ≤50 effective lines micro-task rule.
phase-1-context
Phase 1 — Enterprise Context Analysis (standalone).