Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add malwarebo/nyrve --skill update-skillsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/malwarebo/nyrveWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/malwarebo/nyrve/update-skills)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/malwarebo/nyrve/update-skills"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/malwarebo/nyrve/update-skills/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/malwarebo/nyrve/update-skills"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/malwarebo/nyrve/update-skills.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00051 | $0.00971 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00388 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00194 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00097 |
Grade A, and why
update-skills scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to update-skills — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 115 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Update Skills & Instructions
When a major repository learning is discovered — a recurring pattern, a non-obvious pitfall, a crucial architectural constraint, or domain knowledge that would save future sessions significant time — capture it as a skill or instruction so it persists across sessions.
When to Use
- The user explicitly says "learn!" or asks to capture a learning
- You discover a significant pattern or constraint that cost meaningful debugging time
- You identify reusable domain knowledge that isn't documented anywhere in the repo
- A correction from the user reveals a general principle worth preserving
Decision: Skill vs Instruction vs Learning
Add a learning to an existing instruction when:
- The insight is small (1-4 sentences) and fits naturally into an existing instruction file
- It refines or extends an existing guideline
- Follow the pattern in
.github/instructions/learnings.instructions.md
Create or update a skill (.github/skills/{name}/SKILL.md or .agents/skills/{name}/SKILL.md) when:
- The knowledge is substantial (multi-step procedure, detailed guidelines, or rich examples)
- It covers a distinct domain area (e.g., "how to debug X", "patterns for Y")
- Future sessions should be able to invoke it by name
Create or update an instruction (.github/instructions/{name}.instructions.md) when:
- The rule should apply automatically based on file patterns (
applyTo) or globally - It's a coding convention, architectural constraint, or process rule
- It doesn't need to be invoked on demand
Procedure
1. Identify the Learning
Reflect on what went wrong or what was discovered:
- What was the problem or unexpected behavior?
- Why was it a problem? (root cause, not symptoms)
- How was it fixed or what's the correct approach?
- Can it be generalized beyond this specific instance?
2. Check for Existing Files
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 115 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A f5c7bb3ed56f
update-skills is a skill published in the GitHub repository malwarebo/nyrve (5 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 971 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to update-skills, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
update-skills compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| update-skillsmalwarebo/nyrve | Skill | 5 | 5mo ago | MIT | A | 51 | Claude Code, Codex |
| mirrord-prev-envmetalbear-co/mirrord | Skill | 5.4k | today | MIT | A | 122 | Claude Code, Codex |
| mirrord-operatormetalbear-co/mirrord | Skill | 5.4k | today | MIT | A | 124 | Claude Code, Codex |
| storage-retentionget-bb/bb | Skill | 5.5k | today | MIT | A | 20 | Claude Code, Codex |
| mirrord-upmetalbear-co/mirrord | Skill | 5.4k | today | MIT | A | 73 | Claude Code, Codex |
| modal-sandboxesget-bb/bb | Skill | 5.5k | today | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code, Codex |
| plugin-guide-maintenanceget-bb/bb | Skill | 5.5k | today | MIT | A | 23 | Claude Code, Codex |