Visual Studio Code is a code editor that supports editing, navigating, understanding, debugging, and extending software projects. Developers use it for the edit-build-debug cycle, and the catalogue add-ons provide skills, instructions, and agents for working within the editor.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add microsoft/vscode --skill update-skillsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/microsoft/vscodeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/microsoft/vscode/update-skills)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/microsoft/vscode/update-skills"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/microsoft/vscode/update-skills/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/microsoft/vscode/update-skills"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/microsoft/vscode/update-skills.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- Snyk pass
- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high YARA Match · line 3 YARA rule matched a hack tool or exploit indicator (offensive tools, reconnaissance, privilege escalation, or exploit frameworks).Fix: Remove offensive tool references and exploit code. Legitimate agent skills should not contain penetration testing tools, exploit frameworks, or reconnaissance utilities.
- high Rogue Agent · line 7 Skill modifies its own code, configuration, or behavior at runtime. Self-modification enables an agent to escalate privileges, disable safety constraints, or install persistent backdoors.Fix: Prevent the skill from modifying its own code, SKILL.md, or configuration files. Treat skill files as read-only at runtime.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00051 | $0.00971 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00388 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00194 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00097 |
Grade A, and why
update-skills scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- update-skills — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 115 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Update Skills & Instructions
When a major repository learning is discovered — a recurring pattern, a non-obvious pitfall, a crucial architectural constraint, or domain knowledge that would save future sessions significant time — capture it as a skill or instruction so it persists across sessions.
When to Use
- The user explicitly says "learn!" or asks to capture a learning
- You discover a significant pattern or constraint that cost meaningful debugging time
- You identify reusable domain knowledge that isn't documented anywhere in the repo
- A correction from the user reveals a general principle worth preserving
Decision: Skill vs Instruction vs Learning
Add a learning to an existing instruction when:
- The insight is small (1-4 sentences) and fits naturally into an existing instruction file
- It refines or extends an existing guideline
- Follow the pattern in
.github/instructions/learnings.instructions.md
Create or update a skill (.github/skills/{name}/SKILL.md or .agents/skills/{name}/SKILL.md) when:
- The knowledge is substantial (multi-step procedure, detailed guidelines, or rich examples)
- It covers a distinct domain area (e.g., "how to debug X", "patterns for Y")
- Future sessions should be able to invoke it by name
Create or update an instruction (.github/instructions/{name}.instructions.md) when:
- The rule should apply automatically based on file patterns (
applyTo) or globally - It's a coding convention, architectural constraint, or process rule
- It doesn't need to be invoked on demand
Procedure
1. Identify the Learning
Reflect on what went wrong or what was discovered:
- What was the problem or unexpected behavior?
- Why was it a problem? (root cause, not symptoms)
- How was it fixed or what's the correct approach?
- Can it be generalized beyond this specific instance?
2. Check for Existing Files
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 115 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A f5c7bb3ed56f
update-skills is a skill published in the GitHub repository microsoft/vscode (194,191 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 971 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
open-code-review
Use Alibaba Open Code Review (ocr) to review git diffs, staged changes, branches, or scan a workspace, then summarize findings and optionally fix high-confidence issues.
Release Readiness
Review a change against release gates, rollback safety, validation evidence, and operational risk.
publish-npm-version
Cuts the next release of Prisma 8: bumps the root package.json version (on the v8 RC line: 8.0.0-rc.N → rc.N+1), propagates it to every workspace package, and opens a PR titled "chore(release): bump to ". When the maintainer merges the PR, the Publish to npm workflow runs automatically and ships the new version to npm…
contrib-pr
Open a high-quality external contributor PR against prisma/orm. Use when the user is an outside contributor (not a Prisma maintainer) and wants to submit a change as a pull request from a fork. Encodes the contribution flow from CONTRIBUTING.md so the resulting PR passes review on the first round.
merge-seed
Merge upstream React Starter Kit updates (the seed remote) into main, preserving this project's identity, scope, and behavior. Use when asked to sync, pull, or merge the seed / starter kit / upstream template.
competitor-product-monitor
Monitor competitor product releases and new feature announcements. Use this skill when the user wants to track what competitors are shipping, find the latest product launches in their industry, or generate a competitor release report. Triggers include phrases like "track competitor releases", "what are my competitors…