Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add managedcode/dotnet-skills --skill code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/managedcode/dotnet-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/managedcode/dotnet-skills/code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/managedcode/dotnet-skills/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/managedcode/dotnet-skills/code-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00118 | $0.00682 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00059 | $0.00341 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00136 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00068 |
Grade A, and why
code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- dotnet-code-review — 89% identical, 6 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 62 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
.NET Code Review
Trigger On
- reviewing a pull request or patch in a .NET repository
- checking for behavioral regressions, API misuse, or missing tests
- auditing architectural or framework-specific correctness
References
- checklist.md - comprehensive code review checklist organized by risk priority
- patterns.md - common patterns and anti-patterns for async, disposal, and security
Workflow
- Prioritize correctness, data loss, concurrency, security, lifecycle, and platform-compatibility issues before style concerns. Use the checklist P0-P2 categories first.
- Check async flows, cancellation propagation, exception handling, disposal, and transient versus singleton lifetime mistakes. Refer to patterns.md for common pitfalls.
- Verify tests cover the changed behavior, not only the happy path or refactored implementation details.
- Inspect framework-specific boundaries such as EF query translation, ASP.NET middleware order, Blazor render state, or MAUI UI-thread access.
- Call out missing observability, migration risk, or runtime configuration drift when those are part of the change.
- Keep findings concrete, reproducible, and tied to specific files or behavior.
Key Review Patterns
Async Code
- Async must propagate through the entire call chain; never use
.Result,.Wait(), or.GetAwaiter().GetResult()in async contexts - Always propagate
CancellationTokenparameters - Use
ConfigureAwait(false)in library code - Never use
async voidexcept for event handlers
Resource Disposal
- Use
usingdeclarations or statements for allIDisposableresources - Use
await usingforIAsyncDisposableresources - Use
IHttpClientFactoryinstead of creatingHttpClientdirectly - Unsubscribe event handlers to prevent memory leaks
- Validate DI service lifetimes to prevent captured dependencies
Security
- Use parameterized queries or EF to prevent SQL injection
- Validate all user input at system boundaries
- Prevent path traversal by validating resolved paths stay within allowed directories
- Never hardcode secrets; use configuration and secret management
- Enforce authorization checks before accessing protected resources
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 62 lines · 118 tokens per session scan A 7bcfc2b0bbeb
code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository managedcode/dotnet-skills (477 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 118 tokens to every session and 682 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
skill-coverage-audit
Trace codepaths in diffs, map against tests, auto-generate missing coverage — use before shipping PRs.
go-testing
Trigger: Go tests, go test coverage, Bubbletea teatest, golden files. Apply focused Go testing patterns.
winui-ui-testing
Automated UI testing for Windows desktop apps — generate a batch test script with the winapp ui UI Automation harness, run all tests in one pass, read results. Covers element assertions, interactions, value checking (TextBox, ComboBox, ToggleSwitch), keyboard shortcuts and typing (send-keys), hover, drag-and-drop…
pr-review
Multi-dimensional review of a PR or feature branch in microsoft/win-dev-skills. Activate on "review my PR / changes / branch", "vet before pushing", "PR review", "is this ready to merge". Fans out parallel sub-agents over skill content, the skill-vs-tool boundary (solution hierarchy), tool correctness…
winui-code-review
Code quality review for WinUI 3 apps — MVVM compliance, x:Bind correctness, accessibility, theming, security, and performance. Use before committing to catch issues that the compiler and UI tests won't find.
pre-pr-audit
Pre-PR confidence audit with 5-dimension scoring. Use when: final check before commit/push/PR, evaluating PR readiness, assessing test quality + risk + coverage holistically. Triggers: pre-pr, readiness check, confidence audit, final verification, ready to PR, how confident. Not for: code review (use…