Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Postpartum-genushyacinthus29/dotnet-skills --skill dotnet-code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Postpartum-genushyacinthus29/dotnet-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/postpartum-genushyacinthus29/dotnet-skills/dotnet-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/postpartum-genushyacinthus29/dotnet-skills/dotnet-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/postpartum-genushyacinthus29/dotnet-skills/dotnet-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/postpartum-genushyacinthus29/dotnet-skills/dotnet-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/postpartum-genushyacinthus29/dotnet-skills/dotnet-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.00616 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00308 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00123 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00062 |
Grade A, and why
dotnet-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
89% identical to code-review — 6 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 64 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
.NET Code Review
Trigger On
- reviewing a pull request or patch in a .NET repository
- checking for behavioral regressions, API misuse, or missing tests
- auditing architectural or framework-specific correctness
References
- checklist.md - comprehensive code review checklist organized by risk priority
- patterns.md - common patterns and anti-patterns for async, disposal, and security
Workflow
- Prioritize correctness, data loss, concurrency, security, lifecycle, and platform-compatibility issues before style concerns. Use the checklist P0-P2 categories first.
- Check async flows, cancellation propagation, exception handling, disposal, and transient versus singleton lifetime mistakes. Refer to patterns.md for common pitfalls.
- Verify tests cover the changed behavior, not only the happy path or refactored implementation details.
- Inspect framework-specific boundaries such as EF query translation, ASP.NET middleware order, Blazor render state, or MAUI UI-thread access.
- Call out missing observability, migration risk, or runtime configuration drift when those are part of the change.
- Keep findings concrete, reproducible, and tied to specific files or behavior.
Key Review Patterns
Async Code
- Async must propagate through the entire call chain; never use
.Result,.Wait(), or.GetAwaiter().GetResult()in async contexts - Always propagate
CancellationTokenparameters - Use
ConfigureAwait(false)in library code - Never use
async voidexcept for event handlers
Resource Disposal
- Use
usingdeclarations or statements for allIDisposableresources - Use
await usingforIAsyncDisposableresources - Use
IHttpClientFactoryinstead of creatingHttpClientdirectly - Unsubscribe event handlers to prevent memory leaks
- Validate DI service lifetimes to prevent captured dependencies
Security
- Use parameterized queries or EF to prevent SQL injection
- Validate all user input at system boundaries
- Prevent path traversal by validating resolved paths stay within allowed directories
- Never hardcode secrets; use configuration and secret management
- Enforce authorization checks before accessing protected resources
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 64 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A 9ce852168461
dotnet-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Postpartum-genushyacinthus29/dotnet-skills (10 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 616 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 89% identical to code-review, differing in 6 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
dotnet-techne-cross-repo-impact
Use when reviewing a .NET pull request for breaking changes that may affect other microservice repositories. Detects cross-repo API, DTO, endpoint, EF entity, and NuGet-package breaks, and checks whether a compatible downstream PR already exists. Keywords: cross-repo impact, breaking change, microservice…
dotnet-techne-csharp-type-design-performance
Use when designing types and collections for hot paths and low-allocation .NET code. Keywords: readonly struct, sealed class, ValueTask, Span, FrozenDictionary, FrozenSet, allocation optimisation.
dotnet-techne-synopsis
Use when you need blast-radius analysis, dependency graphs, cross-repo impact, breaking-change diff, or architectural overview of .NET workspaces. Keywords: blast radius, dependency graph, impact analysis, cross-repo, call graph, endpoint map, EF Core lineage, breaking change, daemon, reindex.
dotnet-techne-csharp-api-design
Use when designing or changing public C#/.NET APIs with compatibility and versioning constraints. Keywords: breaking change, API design, backward compatibility, binary compatibility, deprecation strategy, versioning.
dotnet-techne-csharp-concurrency-patterns
Use when choosing .NET concurrency patterns for async I/O, queues, pipelines, or thread safety. Keywords: async/await, channels, dataflow, Rx, lock contention, producer consumer, parallel processing.
dotnet-techne-inspect
Use when you need to inspect NuGet package APIs, list public types, or decompile method/property signatures. Keywords: inspect package API, list types, decompile type, method signatures, NuGet interface.