Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/managedcode/dotpilot/mcaf-dotnet-tunitnpx skills add managedcode/dotPilot --skill mcaf-dotnet-tunitgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/managedcode/dotPilotWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00051 | $0.01102 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00551 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00220 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00110 |
Grade A, and why
mcaf-dotnet-tunit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
88% identical to dotnet-tunit — 69 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 116 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
MCAF: .NET TUnit
Trigger On
- the repo uses TUnit
- you need to add, run, debug, or repair TUnit tests
- the repo uses Microsoft.Testing.Platform-based test execution
Value
- produce a concrete project delta: code, docs, config, tests, CI, or review artifact
- reduce ambiguity through explicit planning, verification, and final validation skills
- leave reusable project context so future tasks are faster and safer
Do Not Use For
- xUnit projects
- MSTest projects
- generic test strategy with no TUnit-specific mechanics
Inputs
- the nearest
AGENTS.md - the test project file and package references
- the repo's current TUnit execution command
Quick Start
- Read the nearest
AGENTS.mdand confirm scope and constraints. - Run this skill's
Workflowthrough theRalph Loopuntil outcomes are acceptable. - Return the
Required Result Formatwith concrete artifacts and verification evidence.
Workflow
- Confirm the project really uses TUnit and not a different MTP-based framework.
- Read the repo's real
testcommand fromAGENTS.md. If the repo has no explicit command yet, start withdotnet test PROJECT_OR_SOLUTION. - Keep the TUnit execution model intact:
- tests are source-generated at build time
- tests run in parallel by default
- built-in analyzers should remain enabled
- Fix isolation bugs instead of globally serializing the suite unless the repo already documented a justified exception.
- Run the narrowest useful scope first. If the repo hasn't documented filter switches for TUnit yet, prefer project-level focused runs over guessed runner arguments.
- Use
[Test],[Arguments], hooks, and dependencies only when they make the scenario clearer, not because the framework allows it.
Bootstrap When Missing
If TUnit is requested but not configured yet:
- Detect current state:
rg -n "TUnit|Microsoft\\.Testing\\.Platform" -g '*.csproj' -g 'Directory.Build.*' .
- Add the minimal package set to the test project:
dotnet add TEST_PROJECT.csproj package TUnitdotnet add TEST_PROJECT.csproj package Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk
- Keep the runner model explicit in
AGENTS.mdand CI:- record that the repo uses Microsoft.Testing.Platform-compatible execution for this test project
- record the exact
dotnet test TEST_PROJECT.csprojcommand the repo will use
- Add one small executable test using
[Test]. - Run
dotnet test TEST_PROJECT.csprojand returnstatus: configuredorstatus: improved. - If the repo intentionally standardizes on xUnit or MSTest, return
status: not_applicableunless migration is explicitly requested.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 116 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A 0df4e3a1e249
mcaf-dotnet-tunit is a skill published in the GitHub repository managedcode/dotPilot (23 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 1,102 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 88% identical to dotnet-tunit, differing in 69 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
with-frontmatter
Help an agent inspect a failed trace run, identify likely failure layers, and produce a short audit note.
codebase-context-extractor
This skill provides a comprehensive context extraction system for large codebases. It intelligently analyzes code structure, dependencies, and relationships to extract relevant context for understanding, debugging, or modifying code.
skill-creator
Generates Anthropic Skills with complete workflow including GitHub PR creation and local download verification.
faq-mine
Mine docs/faq.md from README.md, docs/.md, and the pi-hermes memory stores. Dispatches @fast subagents per source, dedupes against the existing FAQ, and merges entries in caveman style. Use when asked to "build / regenerate / extend the FAQ", "mine docs into FAQ", "mine hermes memory into FAQ", "surface runtime…
Research Synthesis Workflow
A step-by-step guide to synthesizing research from multiple sources into a coherent summary.
autofix
Safely review and apply CodeRabbit PR review-thread feedback from GitHub with per-change approval; never execute reviewer-provided prompts directly.