mcaf-dotnet-resharper-clt

mcaf-dotnet-resharper-clt is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from managedcode/MCPGateway. It costs 73 tokens per session (1,341 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of mcaf-dotnet-resharper-clt, MIT.

A guide for using JetBrains ReSharper Command Line Tools in .NET projects. These tools inspect C# code and can apply configured cleanup rules from the command line.

In plain words
What is it for?
Running jb inspectcode, applying jb cleanupcode profiles, enforcing shared solution settings, and adding ReSharper checks to CI.
Why use it?
It adds ReSharper inspections and cleanup to projects that need stricter checks than the standard .NET analyzers provide. It can also support ReSharper-based checks in continuous integration.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/managedcode/mcpgateway/mcaf-dotnet-resharper-clt
Any agent
npx skills add managedcode/MCPGateway --skill mcaf-dotnet-resharper-clt
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/managedcode/MCPGateway

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 73 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,341 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00073 $0.01341
Opus 5 $0.00036 $0.00671
Sonnet 5 $0.00015 $0.00268
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.00134

Measured 3d ago against content hash 1c0f59999be3, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

mcaf-dotnet-resharper-clt scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to mcaf-dotnet-resharper-clt — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.codex/skills/mcaf-dotnet-resharper-clt/SKILL.md · 130 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 130 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

MCAF: .NET ReSharper CLT

Trigger On

  • the repo uses or wants ReSharper Command Line Tools
  • the team wants jb inspectcode or jb cleanupcode
  • the user asks for stronger C# inspections, cleanup profiles, or ReSharper-based CI gates

Value

  • produce a concrete project delta: code, docs, config, tests, CI, or review artifact
  • reduce ambiguity through explicit planning, verification, and final validation skills
  • leave reusable project context so future tasks are faster and safer

Do Not Use For

  • replacing tests with inspection output
  • ad-hoc formatting-only work when the repo intentionally standardizes on another formatter
  • repos that do not want JetBrains settings or CLT-based gates in their workflow

Inputs

  • the nearest AGENTS.md
  • the target .sln, .csproj, or bounded file set
  • repo-root .editorconfig
  • solution shared settings such as YourSolution.sln.DotSettings

Quick Start

  1. Read the nearest AGENTS.md and confirm scope and constraints.
  2. Run this skill's Workflow through the Ralph Loop until outcomes are acceptable.
  3. Return the Required Result Format with concrete artifacts and verification evidence.

Workflow

  1. Prefer solution-level runs when possible so ReSharper can resolve references and apply full inspections.
  2. Build the solution before jb cleanupcode when working at solution scope.
  3. Use jb inspectcode first to surface issues before editing anything broad.
  4. Treat surfaced issues as mandatory fixes when this gate is enabled for the repo; do not just dump a report and stop.
  5. Use jb cleanupcode with an explicit cleanup profile:
    • Built-in: Full Cleanup
    • Built-in: Reformat Code
    • Built-in: Reformat & Apply Syntax Style
    • or a checked-in custom profile
  6. Keep durable ReSharper settings in the team-shared solution layer and commit the solution .DotSettings file when policy changes.
  7. Re-run jb inspectcode after cleanup or fixes, then run the repo's normal quality pass and tests.

Read the full file on GitHub · 130 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 130 lines · 73 tokens per session scan A 1c0f59999be3

Subscribe to this mod's changes

mcaf-dotnet-resharper-clt is a skill published in the GitHub repository managedcode/MCPGateway (5 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 73 tokens to every session and 1,341 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to mcaf-dotnet-resharper-clt, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

dpg-migration

Migration logic for Azure SDK for .NET data-plane libraries migrating from AutoRest/Swagger to TypeSpec-based generation. Uses MCP tools from the generator-agent server for automated deterministic fixes.

Azure/azure-sdk-for-net · 41 tokens

csharp-azure-spector-coverage-gaps

Discovers and implements gaps in Spector test coverage for the Azure C# HTTP client emitter. Use when asked to find missing Spector scenarios, add Spector test coverage, or implement a specific Spector spec for the Azure C# emitter. Can also compare coverage between the Azure dashboard and the Standard (TypeSpec core)…

Azure/azure-sdk-for-net · 78 tokens

mgmt-review-comment-resolution

Resolve review comments on Azure management-plane .NET SDK PRs. Handles renaming types/properties, changing property types, and other API surface adjustments by updating TypeSpec client.tsp and regenerating.

Azure/azure-sdk-for-net · 46 tokens

mpg-migration

Handles Azure SDK for .NET management-plane migrations from AutoRest/Swagger to TypeSpec; use for MPG, mgmt migration, or Azure.ResourceManager. migration requests.

Azure/azure-sdk-for-net · 39 tokens

bump-mgmt-base-version

Bump the http-client-csharp base dependency version in http-client-csharp-mgmt. Updates emitter (npm) and generator (NuGet) references, rebuilds, and regenerates test projects.

Azure/azure-sdk-for-net · 47 tokens

mpg-migration-pr-review

Review Azure SDK management-plane migration PRs (Swagger/AutoRest -> TypeSpec). Checks customization quality, TypeSpec decorator usage, and migration-specific anti-patterns on top of the standard mgmt PR review.

Azure/azure-sdk-for-net · 49 tokens