mcaf-solid-maintainability

A code-maintainability guide based on SOLID design principles, which help keep software responsibilities clear and dependencies manageable. It focuses on smaller files and classes, sensible composition, and documented exceptions to project limits.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when refactoring large files or classes, reviewing design quality, setting maintainability limits in AGENTS.md, or documenting a justified temporary exception.
Why use it?
It helps reduce code that is too large, tightly coupled, or difficult to change, while making design decisions and verification steps explicit.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/managedcode/mcpgateway/mcaf-solid-maintainability
Any agent
npx skills add managedcode/MCPGateway --skill mcaf-solid-maintainability
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/managedcode/MCPGateway

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 57 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 934 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00057 $0.00934
Opus 5 $0.00028 $0.00467
Sonnet 5 $0.00011 $0.00187
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00093

Measured 2d ago against content hash 5910b58271a4, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

mcaf-solid-maintainability scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.codex/skills/mcaf-solid-maintainability/SKILL.md · 112 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 112 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

MCAF: SOLID Maintainability

Trigger On

  • files, classes, or functions are too large or too coupled
  • maintainability limits in AGENTS.md need to be added or tightened
  • a change needs a justified temporary exception

Value

  • produce a concrete project delta: code, docs, config, tests, CI, or review artifact
  • reduce ambiguity through explicit planning, verification, and final validation skills
  • leave reusable project context so future tasks are faster and safer

Do Not Use For

  • writing architecture docs without touching code structure or policy
  • cosmetic formatting-only edits

Inputs

  • the nearest AGENTS.md
  • the code under change
  • current testing seams and dependency boundaries

Quick Start

  1. Read the nearest AGENTS.md and confirm scope and constraints.
  2. Run this skill's Workflow through the Ralph Loop until outcomes are acceptable.
  3. Return the Required Result Format with concrete artifacts and verification evidence.

Workflow

  1. Read the active values for:
    • file_max_loc
    • type_max_loc
    • function_max_loc
    • max_nesting_depth
    • exception_policy
  2. Evaluate the change through SOLID:
    • single responsibility
    • explicit dependencies
    • composition before inheritance
    • boundaries that are easy to test
  3. Remove hardcoded values and inline string literals from implementation code by moving them into named constants, enums, configuration, or dedicated types.
  4. Split by responsibility, not by arbitrary line count alone.
  5. If a limit must be exceeded temporarily, document the exception exactly where exception_policy requires it.

Deliver

  • smaller, more cohesive code
  • updated maintainability policy when repo rules changed
  • explicit exception records when a temporary breach is justified

Validate

  • size limits are respected or explicitly waived
  • responsibilities are clearer after the change
  • the refactor improves testability instead of only moving lines around
  • literals that matter are named once and reused instead of repeated inline
  • no numeric limit was moved into framework prose or skill metadata

Read the full file on GitHub · 112 lines

Files

What ships with it

3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 112 lines · 57 tokens per session scan A 5910b58271a4

Subscribe to this mod's changes

mcaf-solid-maintainability is a skill published in the GitHub repository managedcode/MCPGateway (5 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 57 tokens to every session and 934 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.