Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/managedcode/prompterone/dotnet-mcaf-human-review-planningnpx skills add managedcode/PrompterOne --skill dotnet-mcaf-human-review-planninggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/managedcode/PrompterOneWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/managedcode/prompterone/dotnet-mcaf-human-review-planning)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/managedcode/prompterone/dotnet-mcaf-human-review-planning"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/managedcode/prompterone/dotnet-mcaf-human-review-planning.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00082 | $0.01201 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00041 | $0.00600 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00240 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00120 |
Grade A, and why
dotnet-mcaf-human-review-planning scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
3 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- dotnet-mcaf-human-review-planning — 98% identical, 2 lines differ
- mcaf-human-review-planning — 97% identical, 4 lines differ
- mcaf-human-review-planning — 89% identical, 25 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 124 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
MCAF: Human Review Planning
Trigger On
- a large AI-generated code drop needs a human review plan
- the reviewer cannot inspect every line and needs prioritization
- the user asks which files are highest risk before doing manual review
- the user names a generated folder and wants a saved review plan for it
Value
- produce a concrete project delta: code, docs, config, tests, CI, or review artifact
- reduce ambiguity through explicit planning, verification, and final validation skills
- leave reusable project context so future tasks are faster and safer
Do Not Use For
- normal small pull-request review
- automated bug finding without creating a human review sequence
Inputs
- the target folder, feature area, or bounded context under review
- the main user journeys or operational flows involved
- any known architecture context, adjacent entities, or existing system rules
- any exact output path the user wants for the saved plan
Quick Start
- Read the nearest
AGENTS.mdand confirm scope and constraints. - Run this skill's
Workflowthrough theRalph Loopuntil outcomes are acceptable. - Return the
Required Result Formatwith concrete artifacts and verification evidence.
Workflow
- Read enough of the target area and its immediate boundaries to understand the generated code before planning review.
- Map the natural flow of operations first:
- sign up or authentication
- create
- update
- register or configure
- execute primary business action
- complete, archive, or finalize
- Use that flow to derive the most efficient human review sequence.
- Use the reviewer's domain knowledge as a force multiplier:
- compare the generated code against known architecture and existing entities
- look for places where the new feature should behave like nearby existing flows
- prioritize boundaries where generated code may drift from established system rules
- Identify high-risk review zones:
- entry points and orchestration layers
- persistence and state transitions
- cross-boundary integrations
- permissions, validation, and invariants
- side effects such as email, payments, jobs, or notifications
- Produce two separate outputs:
- prioritized review flow
- prioritized files or modules to inspect
- Present both outputs in chat.
- If the user asks for a durable artifact, save the plan to the exact docs path they requested; otherwise use
docs/AREA/HUMAN_REVIEW_PLAN.md.
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 124 lines · 82 tokens per session scan A da229bc6e15e
dotnet-mcaf-human-review-planning is a skill published in the GitHub repository managedcode/PrompterOne (42 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 82 tokens to every session and 1,201 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
blazorbindings-maui-third-party
Integrate third-party .NET MAUI control libraries into BlazorBindings.Maui apps by generating Razor wrappers, registering attached properties, and bridging to native elements for imperative APIs such as popups or bottom sheets. Use when adding, updating, or troubleshooting a MAUI control package in a…
mapsui
Use when embedding interactive 2D maps in .NET desktop (WinForms/WPF) or mobile (MAUI) applications — tile layers, vector features, map controls. Mapsui: cross-platform .NET map component library.
signs-of-ai
Detect and remove the tells of AI-generated writing in BOTH English and Spanish, and read back the evidence honestly. Use when the user asks to "de-AI" / "humanize" / "un-slop" a draft, to examine whether text carries the tells (delve, tapestry, "it's not just X, it's Y", "here's the thing", em-dash overuse, an…
release-gatekeeper
End-to-end release validation for Connapse — the 'final boss' before any version ships. Downloads the latest alpha from GitHub Releases, deploys an isolated Docker instance (separate from production), then systematically tests every feature: UI via Playwright, API via curl/REST, MCP tools, search quality, security…
create-tickets
Batch-create GitHub issues from a brainstorming discussion. Decomposes ideas into properly-sized tickets with labels, milestones, and project board placement. Trigger when user says: create tickets, make tickets, turn ideas into issues, create issues from brainstorm, create issues from discussion, batch create issues.
discover-work
Deep research across codebase, GitHub issues, discussions, project board, and architecture docs to discover new tasks, gaps, technical debt, and improvement ideas. Trigger when user says: discover work, find tasks, what needs doing, audit codebase, find gaps, technical debt audit, backlog discovery, brainstorm tasks…