Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to managedcode/PrompterOne. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/managedcode/PrompterOne/main/.codex/skills/dotnet-stylelint/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/managedcode/PrompterOneWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/managedcode/prompterone/dotnet-stylelint)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/managedcode/prompterone/dotnet-stylelint"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/managedcode/prompterone/dotnet-stylelint/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/managedcode/prompterone/dotnet-stylelint"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/managedcode/prompterone/dotnet-stylelint.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00055 | $0.01420 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00568 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00284 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00142 |
Grade A, and why
dotnet-stylelint scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 120 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Stylelint for Stylesheets in .NET Repositories
Trigger On
- the repo has
stylelint.config.*,.stylelintrc*, or CSS and SCSS assets under frontend folders - the user asks for CSS linting, duplicate style cleanup, naming convention enforcement, or design-system guardrails
- the repo needs a stylesheet gate beyond formatting alone
Do Not Use For
- JavaScript or TypeScript ownership; route that to
dotnet-eslintordotnet-biome - runtime accessibility, performance, SEO, or header checks; route that to
dotnet-webhint - repos that intentionally use only Biome for CSS linting and do not want a separate stylesheet linter
Inputs
- the nearest
AGENTS.md package.jsonstylelint.config.*or.stylelintrc*- the stylesheet file types in scope: CSS, SCSS, Less, embedded styles, or generated output
Workflow
- Confirm what Stylelint should own:
- plain CSS only
- CSS plus SCSS
- embedded styles in HTML, Markdown, or framework files
- Prefer repo-local installation and checked-in config.
- Start from a known shared config such as
stylelint-config-standard, then add syntax-specific packages only when the repo truly needs them. - Add repeatable scripts to
package.json, for example:stylelint "**/*.{css,scss}"stylelint "**/*.{css,scss}" --fix
- Keep ignore patterns explicit so build output, vendored assets, and generated CSS do not pollute the signal.
- Treat autofix as controlled cleanup:
- run on a bounded scope first
- inspect the diff
- rerun the frontend build if the repo compiles styles
- Use Stylelint for semantic CSS and selector policy, not as a replacement for site-level audits.
Bootstrap When Missing
- Detect current state:
rg --files -g 'package.json' -g 'stylelint.config.*' -g '.stylelintrc*'rg -n '"stylelint"|"stylelint-config-" --glob 'package.json' .
- Prefer a repo-local install:
npm install --save-dev stylelint stylelint-config-standard
- Add syntax packages only when the repo needs them for SCSS or embedded styles.
- Create or refine
stylelint.config.js,stylelint.config.mjs, or the existing config format. - Add repeatable commands to
AGENTS.mdandpackage.json, then verify with:npx stylelint "**/*.{css,scss}"npx stylelint "**/*.{css,scss}" --fix
- Return
status: configuredif Stylelint is now wired and repeatable, orstatus: improvedif the existing baseline was tightened. - Return
status: not_applicableonly when another documented tool already owns stylesheet linting and migration is not requested.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 120 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A a74b0afb94e9
dotnet-stylelint is a skill published in the GitHub repository managedcode/PrompterOne (45 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 1,420 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-janitor
Periodic codebase hygiene agent. Tracks health metrics, reports risky patterns, makes only zero-risk changes, files tickets for anything that needs judgment.
code-analysis
Use the free built-in .NET SDK analyzers and analysis levels with gradual Roslyn warning promotion. USE FOR: the repo wants first-party .NET analyzers; CI should fail on analyzer warnings; the team needs AnalysisLevel or AnalysisMode guidance. DO NOT USE FOR: third-party analyzer selection by itself; formatting-only…
graphify-dotnet
Use graphify-dotnet to generate codebase knowledge graphs, architecture snapshots, and exportable repository maps from .NET or polyglot source trees, with optional AI-enriched semantic relationships. USE FOR: graphify commands; graph JSON, HTML, SVG, Cypher, Markdown, and Obsidian exports; repository map and…
sonarjs
Use SonarJS-derived rules in .NET repositories that ship JavaScript or TypeScript frontends and need deeper bug-risk, code-smell, or cognitive-complexity checks than a minimal ESLint baseline. USE FOR: SonarQube, SonarCloud, or eslint-plugin-sonarjs setups; frontend code smells; cognitive complexity and deeper…
resharper-clt
Use the free official JetBrains ReSharper Command Line Tools for .NET repositories. USE FOR: jb inspectcode; jb cleanupcode; stronger C# inspections, cleanup profiles, and CI-friendly JetBrains analysis. DO NOT USE FOR: replacing tests with inspection output; ad-hoc formatting-only work when the repo intentionally…
meziantou-analyzer
Use the open-source free Meziantou.Analyzer package for design, usage, security, performance, and style rules in .NET. Use when a repo wants broader analyzer coverage with a single NuGet package. USE FOR: the repo uses or wants Meziantou.Analyzer; the team wants one analyzer pack that covers design, usage, security…