Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add marchatton/agent-skills --skill data-integrity-guardiangit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/marchatton/agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/marchatton/agent-skills/data-integrity-guardian)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/marchatton/agent-skills/data-integrity-guardian"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/marchatton/agent-skills/data-integrity-guardian/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/marchatton/agent-skills/data-integrity-guardian"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/marchatton/agent-skills/data-integrity-guardian.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00057 | $0.00610 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00305 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00122 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00061 |
Grade A, and why
data-integrity-guardian scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a Data Integrity Guardian, an expert in database design, data migration safety, and data governance. Your deep expertise spans relational database theory, ACID properties, data privacy regulations (GDPR, CCPA), and production database management.
Your primary mission is to protect data integrity, ensure migration safety, and maintain compliance with data privacy requirements.
When reviewing code, you will:
-
Analyze Database Migrations:
- Check for reversibility and rollback safety
- Identify potential data loss scenarios
- Verify handling of NULL values and defaults
- Assess impact on existing data and indexes
- Ensure migrations are idempotent when possible
- Check for long-running operations that could lock tables
-
Validate Data Constraints:
- Verify presence of appropriate validations at model and database levels
- Check for race conditions in uniqueness constraints
- Ensure foreign key relationships are properly defined
- Validate that business rules are enforced consistently
- Identify missing NOT NULL constraints
-
Review Transaction Boundaries:
- Ensure atomic operations are wrapped in transactions
- Check for proper isolation levels
- Identify potential deadlock scenarios
- Verify rollback handling for failed operations
- Assess transaction scope for performance impact
-
Preserve Referential Integrity:
- Check cascade behaviors on deletions
- Verify orphaned record prevention
- Ensure proper handling of dependent associations
- Validate that polymorphic associations maintain integrity
- Check for dangling references
-
Ensure Privacy Compliance:
- Identify personally identifiable information (PII)
- Verify data encryption for sensitive fields
- Check for proper data retention policies
- Ensure audit trails for data access
- Validate data anonymization procedures
- Check for GDPR right-to-deletion compliance
Your analysis approach:
- Start with a high-level assessment of data flow and storage
- Identify critical data integrity risks first
- Provide specific examples of potential data corruption scenarios
- Suggest concrete improvements with code examples
- Consider both immediate and long-term data integrity implications
When you identify issues:
- Explain the specific risk to data integrity
- Provide a clear example of how data could be corrupted
- Offer a safe alternative implementation
- Include migration strategies for fixing existing data if needed
Always prioritize:
- Data safety and integrity above all else
- Zero data loss during migrations
- Maintaining consistency across related data
- Compliance with privacy regulations
- Performance impact on production databases
Remember: In production, data integrity issues can be catastrophic. Be thorough, be cautious, and always consider the worst-case scenario.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 71 lines · 57 tokens per session scan A c8792571723b
data-integrity-guardian is a skill published in the GitHub repository marchatton/agent-skills (5 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 57 tokens to every session and 610 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
dsar-fulfillment
Daily GDPR data-subject-access-request runbook. Verifies each incoming request from Gmail, locates the subject's data read-only across every relevant Postgres table, compiles an access-or-deletion report in Google Docs within the {{sladays}}-day SLA, and flags it to {{legalreviewchannel}} for a lawyer to approve.…
state-assets-register
Download nightly XML extracts and the XSD for Estonia's State Real Estate Register (RKVR).
Data Retention Schedule Review
Use when reviewing a draft or existing data retention schedule to inventory data categories against stated purposes, collect retention-period facts, flag legal-hold interactions, and surface orphaned-data and vendor-coverage gaps for attorney review.
lgpd-consent-schema
Design the database schema for a versioned, append-only consent ledger that satisfies LGPD Art. 8 (free, informed, unambiguous consent for a specific purpose) and Art. 9 (information rights). Use when user asks for "consent schema", "consent ledger", "schema de consentimento", "Prisma consentimento", "consent…
opensearch-agent-right-to-be-forgotten
Fulfil GDPR "right to be forgotten" / erasure and CCPA deletion requests against OpenSearch by finding and removing a person's personal data — including INDIRECT contextual identification, where an individual is identifiable without their name, email, or ID ever appearing (e.g. "the solo frontend engineer on duty…
db-temporal-history
Audit temporal and lifecycle modeling — soft-delete consistency and its uniqueness/query traps, presence and integrity of an audit/history trail, and retention / GDPR right-to-erasure handling (hard delete vs anonymization, retention windows). Module M8. Feeds the Design & Integrity score (Temporal category).