Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/marcoemrich/agentic_coding_lab/reanalyzenpx skills add marcoemrich/agentic_coding_lab --skill reanalyzegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/marcoemrich/agentic_coding_labWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/marcoemrich/agentic_coding_lab/reanalyze)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/marcoemrich/agentic_coding_lab/reanalyze"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/marcoemrich/agentic_coding_lab/reanalyze.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00081 | $0.02934 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00041 | $0.01467 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00587 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00293 |
Grade A, and why
reanalyze scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 194 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Skill: reanalyze
Re-run analyze-run.sh on every run matching an RQ selector, reaggregate via aggregate-by-query.py, and propose findings updates. No new runs are started — this skill only refreshes existing data.
Typical use cases:
- Pipeline fix (analyze-run.sh changed, verification adapter added)
- Manual run cleanup (crash runs deleted, runs re-added)
- ESLint/SonarJS config change affecting smell metrics
- New fields added to metrics.json
Argument
RQ-N(e.g.RQ-prompt-known-kata) or a direct path to an RQ dir.- If not given: ask back ("Which RQ? e.g. RQ-prompt-known-kata").
- RQ dirs live in four subtrees:
research/questions-claude/<chapter>-*/,research/questions-opencode/<chapter>-*/,research/questions-cross/<chapter>-*/, andresearch/workflow-dev/<chapter>-*/. The chapter prefix is an ordering label; the stable id is the frontmatterid:(a slug likeRQ-prompt-known-kata). Resolve it to a path by exact-line id-grep across all subtrees:RQ_DIR=$(grep -rlE "^id:[[:space:]]*RQ-prompt-known-kata[[:space:]]*$" \ research/questions-claude/*/README.md \ research/questions-opencode/*/README.md \ research/questions-cross/*/README.md \ research/workflow-dev/*/README.md \ 2>/dev/null | head -1 | xargs -r dirname)
Phases
Run sequentially. On errors in any phase, stop and ask the user, do not skip ahead.
Phase 1 — Resolve & Match
- Resolve the RQ path into
$RQ_DIRvia the id-grep in "Argument" above. On no match, ask the user; on multiple, take the first and inform. - Read
$RQ_DIR/README.md— parse frontmatter forcontrolsandfactors(needed to build the selector). - Find all matching runs in
experiments/runs/:
The selector logic mirrorsfor d in experiments/runs/*/; do jq -e 'select( .kata == "<expected>" and .workflow == "<expected>" and (.model | test("<model-pattern>")) )' "$d/metrics.json" > /dev/null 2>&1 && echo "$d" doneaggregate-by-query.py:kata = kata_base + "-" + promptfor each prompt value (from factors or controls), model from factors or controls, workflow from controls. Match against.kata,.workflow,.modelin each run'smetrics.json. - Report: "Found N runs matching RQ-X selector."
- If N == 0: STOP — "No matching runs found. Check that experiments/runs/ contains runs with the expected kata/workflow/model."
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today Changed · +12 lines 410afc8048e7
- 4d ago First seen · 182 lines · 81 tokens per session scan A 261c3f8e8220
reanalyze is a skill published in the GitHub repository marcoemrich/agentic_coding_lab (11 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 81 tokens to every session and 2,934 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…