Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to marcoemrich/EXACT-Coding-Exercises. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/marcoemrich/EXACT-Coding-Exercises/main/.claude/skills/end-refactor/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/marcoemrich/EXACT-Coding-ExercisesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/marcoemrich/exact-coding-exercises/end-refactor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/marcoemrich/exact-coding-exercises/end-refactor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/marcoemrich/exact-coding-exercises/end-refactor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/marcoemrich/exact-coding-exercises/end-refactor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/marcoemrich/exact-coding-exercises/end-refactor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 131 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 204 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00088 | $0.03832 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00035 | $0.01533 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00766 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00383 |
Grade A, and why
end-refactor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 324 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
This is an optional, manually invoked pass. It is not part of the Red-Green-Refactor loop — the per-cycle
refactoragent handles that. Run this when a piece of work is finished and you want a measured quality pass over the whole tree. It costs noticeably more time and tokens than a per-cycle refactor, and it is worth it mainly on multi-file code where cross-file duplication and complexity hot spots have had room to form.
You are the final refactoring specialist. Where a per-cycle refactor polishes each green step in isolation, your job is different: you see the whole module at once, with all tests passing, and you apply a measurement-driven cleanup pass across the entire production codebase.
This pass is built on a single hypothesis: once the design has stabilised, measuring across all production files reveals cross-file duplication, cross-function complexity hot spots, and naming inconsistencies that a per-cycle refactor cannot see.
Your Mission
Run a final, metric-driven refactoring pass over the whole production code:
- Measure the current state of the entire production tree with the smell and cognitive-complexity tools named by the active stack profile
- Compute APP mass and McCabe cyclomatic complexity for every function in every production file
- Pick the worst offender as the next refactoring target — this may live in any file
- Apply ONE improvement while keeping all tests green
- Re-measure to verify the change actually reduced complexity
- Document the delta for every metric
- Iterate steps 3–6 until no metric improves further (or no further improvement is possible)
- Return a summary of all applied changes with their PRE/POST deltas
Refactoring Rules
- Scope is the whole production tree: every production file of the active stack, excluding test files. Multi-file katas are refactored together.
- Iterate, don't one-shot: keep applying one-change-per-step measurement loops until you genuinely cannot improve any metric without trading off another.
- Tests must stay green: Never break passing tests. Run the stack profile's full-suite command after every single change.
- Apply Simple Design Rules: In priority order (1 → 2 → 3 → 4)
- Measure pre and post: Smells, cognitive complexity, APP mass, McCabe — all four, every iteration
- One change at a time: So the post-measurement attributes the delta to that change
- Naming is first priority: Evaluate if function names still fit purpose now that all tests are in
- If a measurement got worse: revert the change and try a different angle
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +2 lines · +3 tokens per session 2cfed32272fd
- 1mo ago Changed e5c25d4331d1
- 2mo ago First seen · 322 lines · 85 tokens per session scan A 715f5a0e82da
end-refactor is a skill published in the GitHub repository marcoemrich/EXACT-Coding-Exercises (18 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 88 tokens to every session and 3,832 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when debugging a failing test, build error, or runtime issue that isn't immediately obvious. Guides a 4-phase root cause analysis instead of random fix attempts.
log-error-digest
Analyze log files to troubleshoot errors, identify peak error periods, and produce error clustering, frequency statistics, and time distribution reports. Supports JSON, syslog, and Nginx formats with automatic detection. Use when a user uploads a .log file and asks to analyze errors, find patterns, debug issues, or…
cwv-optimizer
Diagnose and fix Core Web Vitals issues on AEM Edge Delivery Services pages. Goes deeper than generic CWV advice by understanding EDS-specific performance patterns including the 100KB LCP budget, E-L-D loading phases, block rendering behavior, and third-party script impact. Produces specific fixes for LCP, CLS, and…
incident-response-incident-response
Coordinate production incident triage, mitigation, investigation, recovery, and follow-up. Use when responding to outages or other incidents that require structured operational coordination.
ci-fixer
CI failures - read error, minimal fix, verify.
diagnosing-missing-recordings
Diagnoses why a session recording is missing or was not captured. Use when a user asks why a session has no replay, why recordings aren't appearing, or wants to troubleshoot session replay capture issues for a specific session ID or across their project. Covers SDK diagnostic signals, project settings, sampling…