Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add marcos-sponton/frameworks-as-skills --skill radical-focusgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/marcos-sponton/frameworks-as-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/marcos-sponton/frameworks-as-skills/radical-focus)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/marcos-sponton/frameworks-as-skills/radical-focus"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/marcos-sponton/frameworks-as-skills/radical-focus/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/marcos-sponton/frameworks-as-skills/radical-focus"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/marcos-sponton/frameworks-as-skills/radical-focus.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00234 | $0.02707 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00117 | $0.01354 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00047 | $0.00541 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00271 |
Grade A, and why
radical-focus scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 107 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Radical Focus
Christina Wodtke's operational method for making OKRs actually work — from Radical Focus (1st ed 2016, 2nd expanded ed 2021), The Team That Managed Itself (2019), her ~15 years of teaching OKRs at Stanford (CS177 Human-Centered Product Management), Elegant Hack blog + Medium (essays through 2026), and podcast appearances including Lenny Rachitsky (2023) and Melissa Perri's Product Thinking (2023).
This skill helps your agent think in Wodtke's method, not just recite OKRs. It's opinionated because Wodtke is opinionated: OKRs without the weekly cadence are a goal fantasy; OKRs at the individual level are performance-review theater; OKRs without a Health Metric are gameable. Doing OKRs isn't hard; doing them Wodtke's way is.
When this skill activates
Use this skill when the user is:
- Writing or rewriting OKRs (their own team's, or someone else's).
- Running quarterly planning and drafting Objectives / Key Results.
- Diagnosing why OKRs "aren't working" — usually a cadence problem, not an OKR problem.
- Setting up a first-time OKR cycle for a team.
- Debating individual OKRs vs. team OKRs.
- Wondering how OKRs relate to KPIs, roadmaps, or health metrics.
- Preparing for or debriefing a Monday commitments / Friday celebrations meeting.
- Considering "code red" — pausing OKR work to protect a health metric.
- Grading OKRs at end of quarter and figuring out what to learn from the 0.6 vs 0.8.
- Coaching a manager who was told to "just do OKRs" and has no framework beyond that.
Do NOT use this skill when:
- The user is asking for strategy (what to compete on, where to play). OKRs translate strategy into team work; they don't replace it. Redirect to
playing-to-winorgood-strategy-bad-strategy. - The user needs a planning system for solo work with no team. Wodtke's method is team-first. Point them at simpler tools.
- The user is pre-team, pre-product, pre-anything. Wodtke: "If you can't do OKRs because you're remote / no one has control over their product / everyone is dependent on other teams — STOP and fix those issues first."
- The user just wants a summary of the book. Give them the book link.
What ships with it
11 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- evals/evals.json 6.4 KB
- README.md 6.0 KB
- references/applications.md 7.1 KB
- references/author-live-sources.md 7.6 KB
- references/examples.md 8.9 KB
- references/heuristics.md 14 KB
- references/method.md 10 KB
- references/post-book.md 13 KB
- references/prompts.md 7.2 KB
- references/sources.md 7.1 KB
- references/voice-and-tone.md 11 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 107 lines · 234 tokens per session scan A f5ac51f83ebe
radical-focus is a skill published in the GitHub repository marcos-sponton/frameworks-as-skills (1 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 234 tokens to every session and 2,707 once invoked, about $0.0012 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
acquire-skills
Find and install skills for what you're doing — tech or reasoning gaps. Matches activity and tech context to relevant skills. Use when entering unfamiliar tech, stuck on a reasoning challenge, or no skill fits.
find-skills
Helps users discover and install agent skills when they ask questions like "how do I do X", "find a skill for X", "is there a skill that can...", or express interest in extending capabilities. This skill should be used when the user is looking for functionality that might exist as an installable skill.
endpoint-discovery
Discovers URLs, endpoints, and paths from web applications using katana, gospider, and gau. Use when needing to enumerate application endpoints, find hidden paths, gather historical URLs, or map web application structure during reconnaissance.
param-miner
Discover hidden HTTP parameters in web applications that could reveal hidden functionality or vulnerabilities. Use when testing APIs, when looking for hidden parameters like admin or debug, or when the user mentions parameter discovery.
git-workflow
This skill should be used when the user asks to "create git commit", "manage branches", "follow git workflow", "use Conventional Commits", "handle merge conflicts", or asks about git branching strategies, version control best practices, pull request workflows. Provides comprehensive Git workflow guidance for team…
daily-paper-generator
Use when the user asks to generate daily paper digests on a general topic. This skill supports both arXiv and bioRxiv (or either one), then produces structured Chinese/English summaries for selected papers.