Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add markifact/markifact-mcp --skill negative-keyword-sweepgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/markifact/markifact-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/markifact/markifact-mcp/negative-keyword-sweep)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/markifact/markifact-mcp/negative-keyword-sweep"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/markifact/markifact-mcp/negative-keyword-sweep/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/markifact/markifact-mcp/negative-keyword-sweep"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/markifact/markifact-mcp/negative-keyword-sweep.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00056 | $0.01514 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00606 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00303 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00151 |
Grade A, and why
negative-keyword-sweep scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 27d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 82 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Goal
Pull the search-terms report, identify spend that isn't producing, group it intelligently, and add negatives at the right level — without nuking legitimate intent.
Inputs to confirm (batch)
- Account name (substring) — required.
- Scope — single campaign, list of campaigns, or "all Search campaigns" — required.
- Lookback — default 30 days; user can override (60 / 90).
- Waste thresholds — defaults; allow override:
- No-converter: spend ≥ $X over lookback AND 0 conversions. Default $X = 2× target CPA, or $50 if no target.
- Low-CVR offender: spend ≥ 3× target CPA AND CVR < 25% of account CVR.
- Off-brand / off-intent: terms that match a denylist of words (e.g.
free,jobs,careers,tutorial,review,salary,download,cheap,pirate,crack) — calibrated to vertical.
- Negative scope preference — default behavior:
- Recurring junk seen across multiple campaigns → account-level shared negative list.
- Waste seen only in one campaign → campaign-level.
- Single-theme misintent (e.g. "free" only hurts a paid product ad group) → ad-group-level.
- Default match type: phrase, except for single-word obvious junk → broad isn't an option (negatives have no broad), so use exact for single tokens like
free.
Workflow
- Discover ops:
gads_select_accounts,gads_list_report_fields,gads_get_report,gads_create_negative_keyword_list,gads_attach_negative_list_to_campaigns,gads_add_keywords_to_negative_list,gads_add_negative_keywords_to_campaigns,gads_add_negative_keywords_to_ad_groups. - Inspect every op via
get_operation_inputs. - Resolve account (substring).
- Pull search-terms report via
gads_get_reportat the search-term granularity (search_term_viewresource). Required fields: search_term, campaign_id/name, ad_group_id/name, impressions, clicks, cost, conversions, conv_value, ctr, cvr. - Compute baselines: account-level CVR over lookback. Compute target CPA if not given (use account history / average across the scope).
- Apply thresholds → candidate list. Tag each candidate with the trigger reason (no-conv, low-CVR, denylist).
- Cluster candidates by intent. Group on shared roots / themes (e.g.
free trial spreadsheet,free template excel,free download→ cluster "free*"). For each cluster, propose:- Negative keyword(s) (the minimum tokens needed to block the cluster — usually a phrase).
- Match type (phrase by default; exact for single-token denylist hits; phrase for multi-word patterns).
- Scope (account / campaign / ad-group) per the rules above.
- Build a preview table showing every proposed negative with: keyword, match, scope, target campaigns/ad groups, wasted spend that would have been blocked, and a sample of 1–3 search terms it covers. Wait for user confirmation.
- Execute:
- Account-level batch → if a list with the right purpose already exists, use
gads_add_keywords_to_negative_list. If not,gads_create_negative_keyword_listthengads_add_keywords_to_negative_listthengads_attach_negative_list_to_campaigns. - Campaign-level batch →
gads_add_negative_keywords_to_campaigns. - Ad-group-level batch →
gads_add_negative_keywords_to_ad_groups.
- Account-level batch → if a list with the right purpose already exists, use
- Confirm: count by scope, total estimated spend blocked.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 27d ago First seen · 82 lines · 56 tokens per session scan A e434d34c5a27
negative-keyword-sweep is a skill published in the GitHub repository markifact/markifact-mcp (52 stars, last pushed 13d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 1,514 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-21.
Other skills, from other repositories
chief-financial-officer
Owns the financial position: planning, budgeting, forecasting, unit economics, cash, and the numbers the business is run and reported on. Use this to build or challenge a budget, model a decision's financial consequence, assess unit economics or runway, evaluate an investment or spend request, set financial controls…
chief-strategy-officer
Owns where the business plays and how it wins over a multi-year horizon — portfolio choices, corporate development, strategic partnerships, and planning under uncertainty. Use this for a decision about which markets or businesses to be in, whether to build, buy, or partner, how to allocate capital across business…
seo-strategy
Audits and improves organic search performance — technical health, site architecture, internal linking, structured data, and the content decisions that determine what can rank. Use this to run an SEO audit, diagnose why pages are not ranking or were deindexed, plan a site's URL and navigation structure, add structured…
customer-success-management
Runs the ongoing relationship with accounts after the sale — segmenting coverage against account value, building a health score that predicts rather than describes, running reviews customers find worth attending, forecasting renewals honestly, and finding expansion that follows usage instead of quota. Use this to…
quantitative-analysis
Answers a business question with data without fooling yourself — framing the question so an answer would change something, choosing the right comparison, checking the data before trusting it, recognizing the traps that produce confident wrong answers (aggregation reversals, survivorship, regression to the mean…
account-based-marketing
Concentrates marketing and sales effort on a named set of accounts rather than on volume — qualifying whether the model fits your economics at all, building the account list and the buying group inside each, tiering effort against account value, coordinating so the account experiences one campaign rather than several…