Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add markmhendrickson/ateles --skill create-rulegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/markmhendrickson/atelesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/markmhendrickson/ateles/create-rule)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/markmhendrickson/ateles/create-rule"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/markmhendrickson/ateles/create-rule/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/markmhendrickson/ateles/create-rule"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/markmhendrickson/ateles/create-rule.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 109 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00011 | $0.00925 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00370 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00185 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00093 |
Grade A, and why
create-rule scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Agent Instructions
When to Load This Document
Load this document when:
- {Trigger condition 1}
- {Trigger condition 2}
Required Co-Loaded Documents
- {Required document 1}
- {Required document 2}
Constraints Agents Must Enforce
- {Constraint to enforce 1}
- {Constraint to enforce 2}
Forbidden Patterns
- {Anti-pattern 1}
- {Anti-pattern 2}
Validation Checklist
- {Validation item 1}
- {Validation item 2}
**Submodule mode:**
For foundation submodule, create file following foundation cursor-rules pattern (simpler structure without Agent Instructions section since these are loaded automatically).
### Step 4: Run Setup Script
**Repository mode:**
1. Run foundation setup script:
```bash
./foundation/scripts/setup-cursor-rules.sh
-
Verify symlink created in
.cursor/rules/:- Expected symlink name:
{location}_{name}_rules.md - Example:
docs/conventions/entity_resolution_rules.md→.cursor/rules/conventions_entity_resolution_rules.md
- Expected symlink name:
-
Output success message:
✅ Rule created successfully! File: docs/{location}/{name}_rules.md Symlink: .cursor/rules/{location}_{name}_rules.md The rule is now available to all Cursor agents in this repository. Next steps: 1. Review the generated rule file and fill in any remaining details 2. Test the rule by triggering its conditions 3. Update related documentation to reference this rule if needed
Submodule mode:
-
If submodule is
foundation, run setup script from main repository:./foundation/scripts/setup-cursor-rules.sh -
Verify symlink created (for foundation rules, they're prefixed with
foundation-) -
Output success message:
✅ Rule created in submodule successfully! File: {submodule}/{rule_path}/{name}{suffix}.mdc (for foundation submodule, use .mdc extension) Symlink: .cursor/rules/{prefix}{name}.mdc (if applicable) The rule is now available to all repositories using this submodule.
Error Handling
- If submodule not found: Exit with error message
- If location directory doesn't exist in repo mode: Offer to create it or exit
- If file already exists: Warn and ask to overwrite or exit
- If setup script fails: Report error but keep the created file
Configuration
Optional configuration in foundation-config.yaml:
agent_instructions:
rules:
default_location: "docs/conventions" # Default location for new rules
template_path: null # Custom template path (optional)
auto_run_setup: true # Automatically run setup script after creation
Examples
Example 1: Create Repository Rule
/create-rule
Prompts:
- Rule file name:
entity_resolution - Location:
subsystems - Purpose: "Ensure consistent entity resolution patterns across codebase"
- Key constraints: "MUST use deterministic merging, MUST NOT introduce randomness"
Creates:
docs/subsystems/entity_resolution_rules.md.cursor/rules/subsystems_entity_resolution_rules.md(symlink)
Example 2: Create Foundation Submodule Rule
/create-rule foundation
Prompts:
- Rule file name:
testing_patterns - Purpose: "Enforce consistent testing patterns"
- Key constraints: "MUST include unit tests, SHOULD use fixtures"
Creates:
foundation/agent_instructions/cursor_rules/testing_patterns.mdc.cursor/rules/foundation_testing_patterns.mdc(symlink)
Required Documents
Load before starting:
foundation/scripts/setup-cursor-rules.sh(setup script)docs/conventions/documentation_standards_rules.md(if creating repo rule)foundation-config.yaml(configuration)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 152 lines · 11 tokens per session scan A c23c35ff765d
create-rule is a skill published in the GitHub repository markmhendrickson/ateles (5 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 11 tokens to every session and 925 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
local-llm-tool
A local LLM execution tool. Requests text generation and chat from models on GPU via Ollama or vLLM. Use when: Use when: on-premise inference, calling Ollama endpoints, or needing summaries and generation with local models.
understand-codebase
Understand an unfamiliar codebase or plan a change safely, using Spine's deterministic knowledge-graph MCP tools. Reach for this before answering structural questions about a repo you don't know, before editing code, or when debugging — it hands you engineering decisions (what a change breaks, what's untested, where a…
continue
Autonomous work — find and execute ready tasks.
review-pr
A pull-request review skill for evaluating proposed code changes and posting a quality verdict. A pull request is a request to merge changes into a shared codebase.
tasks
A task-breakdown tool that turns a plan, specification, feature brief, bug report, technical-debt item, or chore into small TASK-NNN work items. Technical debt means postponed cleanup or design work in a codebase.
roadmap
An implementation plan made from a technical specification, organized into phases, milestones, and dependencies.