Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add martinffx/atelier --skill code-handoffgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/martinffx/atelierWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/martinffx/atelier/code-handoff)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/martinffx/atelier/code-handoff"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/martinffx/atelier/code-handoff/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/martinffx/atelier/code-handoff"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/martinffx/atelier/code-handoff.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00020 | $0.00188 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00075 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00038 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00019 |
Grade A, and why
code-handoff scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Write a handoff document summarising the current conversation so a fresh agent can continue the work. Create <project-root>/.handoff/ if needed and save the document there with a descriptive .md filename.
Include a "suggested skills" section in the document, which suggests skills that the agent should invoke.
Do not duplicate content already captured in other artifacts (PRDs, plans, ADRs, issues, commits, diffs). Reference them by path or URL instead.
Redact any sensitive information, such as API keys, passwords, or personally identifiable information.
If the user passed arguments, treat them as a description of what the next session will focus on and tailor the doc accordingly.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 17 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A f659b584a89c
code-handoff is a skill published in the GitHub repository martinffx/atelier (48 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 188 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
harbor
Harbor intake for external work — the captain only handles unresolved decisions. Sweeps incoming issues and PRs, verifies every claim before disposition, reuses every decision already made, and hands the maintainer a docket whose pending items each carry one question with options, recommendation, impact and evidence.…
pr
Draft a PR body from OMC's paper trail — the smallest visual that proves the change, evidence consumed from the verify protocol (never re-collected), reversibility from the ADR test on the diff, glossary language throughout.
omc-review
Evaluate finished work for defects, risk, and simplification before it ships.
tech-debt-collector
Evidence-gated tech debt and bloat detection. Scouts signals, ranks by materiality, validates by refutation, reports up to 5 findings with actions.
pr-review
Intent-aware map-reduce PR review with CI/CD support, confidence gating, and intelligent comment deduplication.
pr-walkthrough
Generate an evidence-grounded markdown walkthrough for a pull request.