Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add martinffx/atelier --skill code-pull-requestgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/martinffx/atelierWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/martinffx/atelier/code-pull-request)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/martinffx/atelier/code-pull-request"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/martinffx/atelier/code-pull-request/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/martinffx/atelier/code-pull-request"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/martinffx/atelier/code-pull-request.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00084 | $0.00427 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00034 | $0.00171 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00085 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00043 |
Grade A, and why
code-pull-request scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Pull Request / Merge Request Skill
Create, comment on, and merge GitHub pull requests or GitLab merge requests for the
current branch. Assumes the relevant CLI (gh or glab) is installed and authenticated.
This skill is create/read + write-gated. Every write action (create PR, leave comment, respond to comment, merge) requires explicit human confirmation before running.
Start Here
- Detect the platform and find the current branch's open PR/MR — see references/common.md.
- Pick a workflow:
| Workflow | Reference | Trigger phrases |
|---|---|---|
| Create PR/MR | create-pr.md | "open a PR", "make a PR", "submit for review" |
| Read comments | read-comments.md | "read PR comments", "show MR comments" |
| Leave a comment | leave-comment.md | "leave a comment", "comment on the PR" |
| Respond to a comment | respond-to-comment.md | "respond to a comment", "reply on the PR" |
| Merge PR/MR | merge-pr.md | "merge this PR", "ship it", "merge the MR" |
Both GitHub (gh) and GitLab (glab) are first-class. Every write step pauses for
human approval before running the CLI command.
What ships with it
7 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 36 lines · 84 tokens per session scan A 95cfe43c86c9
code-pull-request is a skill published in the GitHub repository martinffx/atelier (48 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 84 tokens to every session and 427 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
pr
Draft a PR body from OMC's paper trail — the smallest visual that proves the change, evidence consumed from the verify protocol (never re-collected), reversibility from the ADR test on the diff, glossary language throughout.
pr-review
Intent-aware map-reduce PR review with CI/CD support, confidence gating, and intelligent comment deduplication.
pr-walkthrough
Generate an evidence-grounded markdown walkthrough for a pull request.
address-pr-feedback
Unified PR feedback workflow - collect, triage, and fix review comments in a single command.
harbor
Harbor intake for external work — the captain only handles unresolved decisions. Sweeps incoming issues and PRs, verifies every claim before disposition, reuses every decision already made, and hands the maintainer a docket whose pending items each carry one question with options, recommendation, impact and evidence.…
project-session-manager
Worktree-first dev environment manager for issues, PRs, and features with optional tmux sessions.