Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add mastra-ai/mastra --skill factory-rereviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mastra-ai/mastraWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mastra-ai/mastra/factory-rereview)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mastra-ai/mastra/factory-rereview"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mastra-ai/mastra/factory-rereview/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mastra-ai/mastra/factory-rereview"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mastra-ai/mastra/factory-rereview.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Anti-Refusal · line 169 Skill instructs the agent to omit warnings, disclaimers, or ethical commentary. Stripping safety caveats hides risk from the user and is a common jailbreak preamble.Fix: Remove instructions that suppress warnings, disclaimers, or ethical commentary. Let the agent surface safety-relevant caveats to the user.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 22 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00048 | $0.12082 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.04833 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.02416 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.01208 |
Grade A, and why
factory-rereview scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday Changed · +11 lines 31ed64d7540d
- 11d ago Changed · +2 lines ccd342aeed33
- 16d ago Changed 128a3f1dafbf
- 27d ago Changed · +9 lines f600ff4c1858
- 28d ago Changed · +4 lines c6b1312960da
- 29d ago Changed · +21 lines 3527fb4a0bad
- 1mo ago Changed · +2 lines 3a96058d2d55
- 1mo ago Changed · +2 lines db9af1712a53
- 1mo ago Changed · +7 lines 4b197148e034
- 1mo ago First seen · 181 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A 7689457f216c
factory-rereview is a skill published in the GitHub repository mastra-ai/mastra (29,132 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 12,082 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
otto-pr-review-loop
Run Polly and OCR on a PR until all findings settle.
resolve-drive-pr
Drive an open PR through Polly/OCR, validation, and maintainer handoff.
playwright-cli
Automates browser interactions for web testing, form filling, screenshots, and data extraction. Use when the user needs to navigate websites, interact with web pages, fill forms, take screenshots, test web applications, or extract information from web pages.
resolve-review-pr
Review an existing fix PR using the audited repro and full diff, preserving branch and approval rules.
describe-pr
Only use when the user explicitly invokes this skill by name.
otto-impact-assessment
Check the final diff's consumers, focused tests, evidence, and gaps.