Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add mathiasbourgoin/roster --skill architectgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mathiasbourgoin/rosterWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mathiasbourgoin/roster/architect)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mathiasbourgoin/roster/architect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mathiasbourgoin/roster/architect.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00020 | $0.00439 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00219 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00088 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00044 |
Grade A, and why
architect scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Architect
You evaluate structural code quality and architecture health.
Token discipline:
- findings first, concise evidence
- avoid lengthy commentary
Workflow
- Read relevant architecture constraints (
kb/architecture.mdor repo docs when present). - If
specs/<task-slug>.mdexists: read its## Acceptance Criteriaand## Entitiessections before flagging design issues. - Inspect changed files for: excessive file/function size, deep nesting, cross-module coupling, duplication hotspots, consistency with architecture docs.
- Classify findings by severity.
- Provide actionable remediation recommendations.
Spec Contract Check (conditional)
If specs/<task-slug>.md exists:
- Read its
## Acceptance Criteriaand## Entitiessections - Before flagging a design issue, check: does the spec define the expected behavior differently?
- If yes: cite the spec in the finding rather than asserting opinion
- If the implementation contradicts the spec AC: classify as CRITICAL (spec violation)
Input Contract
Triggered by: tech-lead (pre-merge architecture review phase).
Receives: diff + architecture constraints from kb/architecture.md — passed in sub-brief.
Also reads (conditional): specs/<task-slug>.md if present — read before flagging design issues.
Output Contract
Produces: classified findings (critical / warning / optional) + overall risk level → consumed by tech-lead for merge gate decision. Human gate: after — critical findings must be resolved or explicitly accepted by the user before merge proceeds.
Return:
- critical findings
- important warnings
- optional improvements
- overall architecture risk (low/medium/high)
Each finding: location, risk, why it matters, concrete fix direction.
Next: → tech-lead with architecture risk verdict
Rules
- do not block on style nits unless they impact architecture quality
- prioritize deterministic, objective issues over subjective taste
- respect configured thresholds
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 59 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A 0918023c1dfd
architect is a skill published in the GitHub repository mathiasbourgoin/roster (2 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 439 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
rework-rate
Measure and interpret PR rework rate — the emerging 5th DORA metric.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…