Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add MatrixFounder/Agentic-development --skill skill-planning-formatgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MatrixFounder/Agentic-developmentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/matrixfounder/agentic-development/skill-planning-format)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/matrixfounder/agentic-development/skill-planning-format"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/matrixfounder/agentic-development/skill-planning-format/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/matrixfounder/agentic-development/skill-planning-format"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/matrixfounder/agentic-development/skill-planning-format.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00023 | $0.01979 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00792 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00396 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00198 |
Grade A, and why
skill-planning-format scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 123 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Planning Output Format
Purpose: Defines the rigid structure for planning documents effectively.
1. Red Flags (Anti-Rationalization)
STOP if you are thinking:
- "I'll plan the details later" -> WRONG. "Later" means "Never". Breakdown must happen NOW.
- "This task is too simple for a file" -> WRONG. Every unit of work needs a
task-*.mdfile for tracking. - "I'll use my own format" -> WRONG. The Orchestrator relies on this specific structure.
- "I'll draw the plan chart by hand" -> WRONG.
plan_gantt.pygenerates it from the schedule block (§2.1).
2. Development Plan Structure (docs/PLAN.md)
The Main Plan acts as the "Table of Contents" for the feature.
[!TIP] Use the template at
assets/templates/plan_md_template.md.
2.1. Schedule block and plan chart
Every docs/PLAN.md carries the schedule block that the template shows. The plan chart is
generated by plan_gantt.py of mermaid-authoring-guidelines, never written by hand.
- Directly under
<!-- contract:schedule -->, write onejsonfence of schemaplan-schedule/v1. It lists every task of the sequence once, with theidof its record. Each entry holdstitle,stage,estin integer hours,depsas a list of ids, and"status": "not-started". The develop workflows change the status (§2.2). The script refuses an entry that breaks one of these rules:idmatches^[A-Za-z0-9][A-Za-z0-9._-]*$. It is not a gantt keyword such assection, it does not start withgantt,topAxisorinclusiveEndDatesfollowed by.or-, and it does not start with a date. Keywords match in any letter case. Two ids collide when they are equal with each.,-and_read asx, such as1.1,1-1and1x1.estis a whole number, at least 1.titleandstageeach keep a visible character once#and zero-width characters are dropped. Two stages whose section titles come out the same, such asOps#andOps, are refused; rename one.- The bar label is
<id> <title>. The label limit ofmermaid-authoring-guidelinescounts both (references/gantt.md§1.3). A longer label is shortened, with a warning. The id stays whole.
- For every plan, run
python3 .agent/skills/mermaid-authoring-guidelines/scripts/plan_gantt.py docs/PLAN.md --write docs/PLAN.md. With 8 or more tasks, the chart lands between<!-- generated:plan-gantt-start -->and<!-- generated:plan-gantt-end -->. Postcondition: the same command with--checkin place of--writeexits 0. - With fewer than 8 tasks, add no chart. The command of step 2 still validates the block, and both markers stay, with nothing between them.
- Exit 1 names the defect, such as a cycle, an unknown dependency, a duplicate id or a
non-integer estimate. Fix the block and repeat step 2. Each line that starts with
plan_gantt: warning:needs an answer, although the exit code is 0. Over the soft bar budget, or with a bar too narrow to read, split the chart (step 6) or attach a render check. A shortened label or section title: shorten the title or the stage name. A label that shows no title: shorten the id. - After any later change to the block, repeat step 2.
- Over the plan chart budget of
mermaid-authoring-guidelines(itsreferences/gantt.mdstates it), generate one chart per stage group. Add--stages A,B --stages Cto the--writeof step 2, one option per chart, and name every stage in exactly one group. The script stores the groups in the first line of the region,<!-- plan-gantt-groups: ... -->, so the commands of step 2 keep the split as written. A later--stagesreplaces the groups; one group that names every stage returns the plan to one chart. - Without
.agent/skills/mermaid-authoring-guidelines/in the project, the command of step 2 cannot run. Add no chart at any plan size. Report the absent skill at any plan size, in thefiguresfield of the planner's return JSON.
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago Changed e7432c5feaaf
- 9d ago Changed · +9 lines d17ca41592f4
- 11d ago Changed · +21 lines f8363f0712ac
- 13d ago Changed · +49 lines 5ec0cbb30a72
- 1mo ago First seen · 44 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A 195eb245c271
skill-planning-format is a skill published in the GitHub repository MatrixFounder/Agentic-development (6 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 1,979 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
08-debug
Reproduce and fix a known bug, or find an unknown root cause by hypothesis validation. Use when the user wants to fix a bug, find why something breaks, or reopen a stuck investigation. Not for building a feature or reviewing a diff.
workflow
Perform any development work on the ambient-ui component. Full workflow instructions.
chimera-write-the-check-before-the-code
A criterion written after the implementation describes the implementation. Write the failing check first, watch it fail, then build.
Learn what defines effective BDD scenarios
Interactive guidance on writing complete, effective BDD scenarios for story-flow.
hatch3r-bug-fix
Step-by-step bug fix workflow. Diagnose root cause, implement minimal fix, write regression test. Use when fixing bugs, working on bug report issues, or when the user mentions a bug.
ap-policies
Attach a completion policy gate (shell check or judge-agent rubric) to a session or fan-in group so turn-end only passes when the gate is green, then optionally auto-commit pending human ack. Use when the user says "gate this session on tests passing", "attach a policy", "commit only if tests are green", "judge…