Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add mattbaconz/signal --skill signal-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mattbaconz/signalWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mattbaconz/signal/signal-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mattbaconz/signal/signal-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mattbaconz/signal/signal-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mattbaconz/signal/signal-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mattbaconz/signal/signal-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00083 | $0.01398 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00033 | $0.00559 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00280 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00140 |
Grade A, and why
signal-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 171 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
⚡ signal-review — Templated Code Review
One line per issue. Severity required. Summary at the end. No prose.
Invocation Triggers
Activate when user says any of:
/signal-review"review this","review my code","review this file""check this PR","code review","look at this diff""what's wrong with this","any issues with this code"
Target can be: a file, a diff, a PR URL, a code block, or the current working directory.
Slash command behavior
If the user's message is only /signal-review, treat that as review now.
- Do not stop after acknowledging the skill.
- Do not ask for confirmation unless the user explicitly asked for draft / dry behavior.
- Immediately inspect the provided target (or current working context) and output the review in the format below in the same turn.
Output Format
One line per issue:
{file}:{line}|{issue}|{severity:1-5}|{fix}
Full example:
auth.js:47|nullref on empty arr|4|add guard clause before map
api.js:103|missing await on async call|5|add await
utils.js:12|unused import lodash|1|remove import
∑ 3 issues [1×sev5, 1×sev4, 1×sev1] critical→api.js:103
Rules:
- Severity is required on every line. No exceptions.
- Issue description: max ~60 chars, imperative noun phrase ("nullref on empty arr", not "there is a null reference error")
- Fix: max ~50 chars, imperative ("add guard clause before map", not "you should add a guard clause")
- Order by severity descending (sev5 first)
- One summary line at the end, always
Summary Line Format
∑ {N} issues [{breakdown}] critical→{highest-sev-location}
Examples:
∑ 5 issues [2×sev5, 1×sev3, 2×sev1] critical→auth.js:47
∑ 1 issue [1×sev2]
∑ 0 issues ✓
If zero issues: output only ∑ 0 issues ✓. No explanation, no praise.
Severity Scale
Full definitions in references/severity.md. Quick reference:
| Level | Meaning |
|---|---|
5 |
Breaks in production, security vulnerability, data loss |
4 |
Likely runtime error, will crash under normal use |
3 |
Wrong behavior under specific conditions, logic error |
2 |
Code smell, maintainability issue, confusing pattern |
1 |
Style, minor cleanup, nitpick |
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 171 lines · 83 tokens per session scan A 081920f9f7e7
signal-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository mattbaconz/signal (11 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 83 tokens to every session and 1,398 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
signal-review compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| signal-reviewmattbaconz/signal | Skill | 11 | 4mo ago | MIT | A | 83 | Claude Code |
| simplifyfcakyon/claude-codex-settings | Skill | 1.2k | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 97 | Claude Code |
| chisle-reviewJayPokale/Chisle | Skill | 750 | 3d ago | MIT | A | 73 | Claude Code |
| resolve-pr-commentsfcakyon/claude-codex-settings | Skill | 1.2k | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 47 | Claude Code |
| review-prfcakyon/claude-codex-settings | Skill | 1.2k | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 36 | Claude Code |
| chisle-helpJayPokale/Chisle | Skill | 750 | 3d ago | MIT | A | 53 | Claude Code |
| lov-code-reviewlovstudio/skills | Skill | 72 | today | MIT | A | 41 | Claude Code |