contract-review

contract-review is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from Maudeunfledged834/startup-founder-skills. It costs 26 tokens per session (1,797 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of contract-review, MIT.

A structured review of a binding agreement before signing, including vendor, customer, partnership, investment, employment, confidentiality, and intellectual-property contracts. It summarizes the agreement and examines its sections for risk.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review an existing contract, summarize what it does, flag concerns, assess proposed terms, and prepare points to negotiate with the other party.
Why use it?
It makes important obligations, unfavorable terms, and negotiation points easier to spot before they become commitments. It also organizes the review around the relationship and context of the deal.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to review an existing contract, summarize what it does, flag concerns, assess proposed terms, and prepare points to negotiate with the other party.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/maudeunfledged834/startup-founder-skills/contract-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add Maudeunfledged834/startup-founder-skills --skill contract-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Maudeunfledged834/startup-founder-skills

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for contract-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/maudeunfledged834/startup-founder-skills/contract-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/maudeunfledged834/startup-founder-skills/contract-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/maudeunfledged834/startup-founder-skills/contract-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/maudeunfledged834/startup-founder-skills/contract-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for contract-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/maudeunfledged834/startup-founder-skills/contract-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/maudeunfledged834/startup-founder-skills/contract-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 26 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,797 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00026 $0.01797
Opus 5 $0.00013 $0.00898
Sonnet 5 $0.00005 $0.00359
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00180

Measured 12d ago against content hash acf10ef952d8, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

contract-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to contract-review — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

skills/contract-review/SKILL.md · 132 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 132 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Contract Review

When to Use

Activate when a founder has received a contract to sign and wants to understand the risks before proceeding. This includes vendor agreements, customer enterprise agreements, partnership deals, investment documents, employment agreements, NDAs, IP assignment agreements, and any other binding legal document. Also activate when the user says things like "review this contract," "is this agreement fair," "what should I push back on," or "flag anything concerning."

Context Required

  • From startup-context: company stage, team size, business model, fundraising status, current revenue, and any existing legal counsel.
  • From the user: the contract text (or key sections), who the counterparty is, the business relationship context (are they a customer, vendor, investor, partner), the user's negotiating leverage, and any specific concerns they have. Also helpful: whether this is a template/standard agreement or has been negotiated.

Workflow

  1. Contract intake — Receive the contract text. Identify the contract type, parties, effective date, and term. Create a one-paragraph summary of what the contract does.
  2. Section-by-section analysis — Walk through each major section, summarizing what it means in plain language and flagging anything noteworthy.
  3. Risk flagging — Apply the red/yellow/green flagging system (see below) to each clause. Assign a severity and explain why.
  4. Missing protections — Identify standard protections that are absent from the contract but should be present given the contract type and relationship.
  5. Negotiation recommendations — For each red and yellow flag, suggest specific alternative language or a negotiation strategy.
  6. Summary report — Produce a structured risk assessment with prioritized action items.

Output Format

Contract Summary (top of report)

  • Contract type: (e.g., SaaS vendor agreement, MSA, NDA)
  • Parties: Company name vs. counterparty name
  • Term: Duration, renewal mechanism
  • Total value: Financial commitment if applicable
  • Overall risk level: Red / Yellow / Green with one-sentence rationale

Read the full file on GitHub · 132 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 132 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A acf10ef952d8

Subscribe to this mod's changes

contract-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Maudeunfledged834/startup-founder-skills (6 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 1,797 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to contract-review, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.