Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add MauricioPerera/KDD --skill pm-sonnet-opus-haikugit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MauricioPerera/KDDWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mauricioperera/kdd/pm-sonnet-opus-haiku)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mauricioperera/kdd/pm-sonnet-opus-haiku"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mauricioperera/kdd/pm-sonnet-opus-haiku/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mauricioperera/kdd/pm-sonnet-opus-haiku"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mauricioperera/kdd/pm-sonnet-opus-haiku.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Anti-Refusal · line 67 Skill instructs the agent to omit warnings, disclaimers, or ethical commentary. Stripping safety caveats hides risk from the user and is a common jailbreak preamble.Fix: Remove instructions that suppress warnings, disclaimers, or ethical commentary. Let the agent surface safety-relevant caveats to the user.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00277 | $0.06841 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00138 | $0.03420 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00055 | $0.01368 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00028 | $0.00684 |
Grade A, and why
pm-sonnet-opus-haiku scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 186 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Sonnet 5 = PM · Opus 4.8 = implementador · Haiku 4.5 = QA
Patrón genérico, independiente del repo. El repo de trabajo es el cwd salvo que el usuario indique otro: sustituí <REPO> por esa ruta. Sirve para una sola tarea o para orquestar varias en paralelo.
Por qué esta asignación (no la inviertas)
- El orquestador quema turnos y contexto durante TODA la sesión; el implementador solo por tarea acotada. Por eso el barato dirige y el caro implementa: Sonnet 5 rinde cerca de Opus 4.8 en trabajo agéntico a fracción del precio, y trae 1M de contexto por defecto, que es exactamente lo que un PM necesita para sostener plan, specs y veredictos sin compactar.
- Opus 4.8 se reserva para donde su capacidad extra rinde: implementación no trivial, arquitectura, bugs finos.
- QA en Haiku 4.5, misma familia que el implementador: se pierde la diversificación de sesgos entre proveedores que daba un modelo externo, a cambio de cero dependencia externa (sin login, sin cuenta cloud, sin tags que se retiran) y de read-only GARANTIZADO por ausencia de tools de escritura en la definición del subagent — no por una bandera de permisos que hay que confiar a ciegas. Si más adelante querés diversidad real de familia, se puede volver a un QA externo (Kimi, GPT, etc.) sin tocar el resto del patrón.
Prerrequisitos
- Sesión principal en Sonnet 5: arrancá con
claude --model claude-sonnet-5o cambiá con/model claude-sonnet-5. Confirmalo antes de empezar; si la sesión corre en otro modelo, avisale al usuario. - Subagent implementador definido en
.claude/agents/implementador-opus.md(plantilla abajo). Si no existe, crealo como primer paso. - Subagent QA definido en
.claude/agents/qa-haiku.md(plantilla abajo). Si no existe, crealo como primer paso, junto con el implementador. - Subagent verificador adversarial definido en
.claude/agents/verificador-adversarial-haiku.md(plantilla abajo). Solo hace falta si vas a usar el paso opcional de verificación adversarial (Capa 3); crealo la primera vez que lo necesites.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 186 lines · 277 tokens per session scan A abcab840b828
pm-sonnet-opus-haiku is a skill published in the GitHub repository MauricioPerera/KDD (8 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 277 tokens to every session and 6,841 once invoked, about $0.0014 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
crit-cli
Use when an agent needs to author or reply to crit inline comments programmatically (including multi-agent workflows commenting on shared code/plans/docs/proposals), publish or unpublish a crit review with crit share, sync a crit review to or from a GitHub PR or GitLab MR, or read/interpret a crit review JSON file.…
crit-story
Author a crit story and continue the interactive review loop only when the user explicitly invokes crit-story or directly asks you to generate a crit story. Do not infer this skill from generic review, PR, or diff-review requests.
crit
Review code changes, a plan, a live page (running dev server), or a local HTML file with Crit inline comments and structured human feedback. Use only when the user explicitly invokes /crit or directly asks to use Crit; a generic review request does not count.
sdlc-accelerate
End-to-end SDLC ramp-up from idea to construction-ready with automated phase transitions.
project-awareness
Detect project type, AIWG framework state, team configuration, and active work to summarize status and recommend next actions.
workspace-prune-working
Clean up .aiwg/working/ by promoting, archiving, or deleting temporary files.