Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/maxkle1nz/m1ndnpx agentmods add skills/maxkle1nz/m1nd/m1nd-operatorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/maxkle1nz/m1nd/m1nd-operator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/maxkle1nz/m1nd/m1nd-operator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/maxkle1nz/m1nd/m1nd-operator.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 3 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Rogue Agent · line 514 Skill modifies its own code, configuration, or behavior at runtime. Self-modification enables an agent to escalate privileges, disable safety constraints, or install persistent backdoors.Fix: Prevent the skill from modifying its own code, SKILL.md, or configuration files. Treat skill files as read-only at runtime.
- medium Rogue Agent · line 285 Skill establishes unauthorized persistence across sessions via cron jobs, startup scripts, or state files. Session persistence allows an attacker to maintain access beyond the current interaction.Fix: Remove any persistence mechanisms (cron jobs, startup scripts, state files). Skills should not maintain state across sessions without explicit user consent.
- medium Data Exfiltration · line 949 Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.Fix: Verify the destination URL is trusted and necessary. Remove or replace with documented APIs. Ensure no secrets, tokens, or PII are transmitted.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00111 | $0.16554 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00056 | $0.08277 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00022 | $0.03311 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.01655 |
Grade A, and why
m1nd-operator scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
curl -s http://127.0.0.1:1338/mcp \ How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 1,036 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
m1nd Operator
This is the deep execution manual that complements the short m1nd-first doctrine.
Use this skill when m1nd should be the first layer of truth for the task.
m1nd is strongest when structure, connected context, blast radius, continuity, docs/code bindings, or multi-agent coordination are the bottleneck. It is not the replacement for rg, the compiler, runtime logs, or the test runner.
Default Stance
Default to m1nd before grep, glob, or manual file reads.
The first question is not "which shell command should I run?" It is "can m1nd answer or narrow this directly from graph structure, connected context, docs, or cross-domain bindings?"
Only skip the m1nd first pass when:
- the user already gave the exact file and exact lines
- the question is pure compiler/test/runtime truth
- the task is a trivial local file action with no search or structural uncertainty
Trust-first is calibrated-first, not blind-first. Default to m1nd, AND hold its honest ruler in
the same hand: it narrows and connects, never replaces the compiler/tests/runtime; and it still
has live stumbles measured in the field — federated seek/federate can hang past 60s
(bound-timeout it or fall back), a freshly-memorized claim can lag its own semantic recall for a
tick (the write is durable — re-seek or widen, don't conclude absence), and the runner naming
lane can fall back to heuristics under load. In each case WORK AROUND + one field-report line;
never blind insistence. The reason to still go first: the calibrated absence
(abstain/caller_root_mismatch/gathering) is itself the answer that most often changes the
decision — the counterfactual test for attribution.
Trained Agent Loop
For unfamiliar repo work, audits, bug hunts, reviews, and risky changes, the measured high-signal pattern starts by never starting cold:
- Call
north(task)FIRST, before reading or editing anything. It is the in-session front door. One round-trip returns binding trust (trust_mode; repair travels with it when degraded), task context (focus nodes + PageRank anchors), prior cross-session memory (each claim with real age + author — absent, never faked, when unknown), a sufficiency signal, onenext_move, andhonest_gaps(what m1nd does NOT know) — pluscode, the real SOURCE of the top focus nodes (the symbol's own lines, or the file head when a node names no symbol) for up to 3 files inside a ~2,000-char budget, each slice declaringtotal_linesvslines_returnedandtruncated. Read that payload instead of grepping or re-opening what north just named; widen the first call withcode_budget_charsrather than paying a second round-trip, and passcode: falsewhen you want orientation only.northcomposestrust_selftest+orient+boot_memory+focus+surgical_context/batch_view; reach for the pieces directly only when you need just one. Heedreception:reception.match == "caller_root_mismatch"means the bound graph does NOT cover your current repo — do not trust retrieval for it; readreception.options[]. Generic cross-rootingestremains withdrawn (project_rootabsent from the published schema), and over the wirebrain.bootstrap.birthanswers every client withhuman_gesture_required. The way forward for a brainless repo is the human's one-time ceremonym1nd init --birth <repo>: offer that command and stop. Until the human runs it, continue only against the bound graph with the mismatch warning intact, or reconnect to an owner that already hosts the intended repo. Absent/null = your root matches the brain serving you. Reception governs WRITES too, not only reads: a read under mismatch is a warning, a WRITE under mismatch is prohibited (see Write-Mode Laws below) — and no public bootstrap lifts it. VERSION SKEW: this skill describes the CURRENT product; checkbinding.fingerprint.binary_version(and itsbinary_driftwarning) in the same packet before trusting either era's rule. A legacy 1.4.x served owner still HAS the one-call bootstrap, and thereingest {project_root: <your repo root>}is the correct foreign-repo gesture — it mints a SEPARATE per-project brain, never replacing the bound one. A plainingest {path}from a foreign root is wrong in EVERY era: on a legacy owner it wholesale-REPLACES the bound brain (2026-07-24 incident — a 29k-node brain swapped for a foreign graph, restored the same day). - If
northreturnsneeds_ingest(empty/unbound graph), re-scan and callnorthagain.needs_ingestis a REAL answer, not a failure. On a brain that already DECLARES your root, the repair is yours to run and needs no human:ingest {mode:"refresh", path: <your root>}from exactly that root (Law 3 below). On a root no brain declares, it is not a refresh — no agent mints a brain on any transport — and the honest move is to OFFER the human their one-time ceremony,m1nd init --birth <repo>, and stop (or reconnect to an owner that already hosts the repo). A plainingest {path}(modereplace) remains refused, and its refusal now names that same command. - Act on verdicts, do not override them (see below).
- Prove final truth with direct source reads, tests, compiler/runtime output, and focused probes.
- Before edits/reviews, run
impact,validate_plan, and usuallysurgical_context_v2. - Record the investigation path: m1nd calls, recovery decisions, files inspected, commands run, and fallback reason.
What ships with it
6 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 1,036 lines · 111 tokens per session scan A 8360cdd21bf7
m1nd-operator is a skill published in the GitHub repository maxkle1nz/m1nd (22 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 111 tokens to every session and 16,554 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
trace-mcp
Use trace-mcp tools for code navigation, impact analysis, and framework-aware queries instead of Read/Grep/Glob/Bash. Activate whenever the agent needs to explore, understand, or modify a codebase that has trace-mcp indexed.
trace-mcp-codemod
Use trace-mcp applycodemod for any bulk mechanical change instead of repeated Edit calls. Activate whenever the same edit pattern would be applied 2+ times, across one file or many.
trace-mcp-refactoring
Safe refactoring workflow using trace-mcp — assess risk, find candidates, check impact, and rename symbols across all files without missing import sites or cross-file references.
trace-mcp-pre-commit
Run trace-mcp security, quality-gate, and antipattern checks before committing or opening a PR. Activate when the agent is about to create a commit or pull request in a project indexed by trace-mcp.
qartez
Semantic code intelligence skill for qartez MCP. Use qartez tools for code exploration, impact analysis, and guarded refactors; treat built-in code-tool denials as routing signals and recover via qartez replacements.
requirements-authoring
To author, update, and validate functional/non-functional requirements as atomic units with user approval.