Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add mayurrathi/awesome-agent-skills --skill address-github-commentsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mayurrathi/awesome-agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mayurrathi/awesome-agent-skills/address-github-comments)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mayurrathi/awesome-agent-skills/address-github-comments"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mayurrathi/awesome-agent-skills/address-github-comments/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mayurrathi/awesome-agent-skills/address-github-comments"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mayurrathi/awesome-agent-skills/address-github-comments.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.00309 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00124 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00062 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00031 |
Grade A, and why
Address Github Comments scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 61 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A a958a2ba45ef
Address Github Comments is a skill published in the GitHub repository mayurrathi/awesome-agent-skills (8 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 309 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
golang-refactoring
Golang refactoring — safe, at-scale restructuring of existing Go code: a coverage-adaptive safety net, behavior-preserving transforms (gopls Rename/Extract, gofmt -r, gopatch), the Fowler catalog mapped to Go, breaking import cycles, and small stacked PRs. Apply when a function or type has grown too large, a code…
code-review-ai-ai-review
Combine static analysis with model-assisted code review to assess security, performance, correctness, and architecture. Use when designing review automation or reviewing complex changes.
code-refactoring-tech-debt
Identify and prioritize technical debt by maintenance cost, delivery impact, and risk. Use when assessing code health or planning a measurable remediation roadmap.
error-debugging-multi-agent-review
Coordinate specialized code, security, architecture, and performance reviewers and consolidate their results. Use when a codebase needs parallel review across multiple disciplines.
code-reviewer
Elite code review expert specializing in modern AI-powered code analysis, security vulnerabilities, performance optimization, and production reliability. Masters static analysis tools, security scanning, and configuration review with 2024/2025 best practices. Use PROACTIVELY for code quality assurance.
comprehensive-review-full-review
Coordinate code quality, architecture, security, performance, testing, and documentation reviews. Use when a change or codebase needs a consolidated assessment across these areas.