Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add mdelapenya/coding-skills --skill pr-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mdelapenya/coding-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mdelapenya/coding-skills/pr-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mdelapenya/coding-skills/pr-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mdelapenya/coding-skills/pr-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mdelapenya/coding-skills/pr-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mdelapenya/coding-skills/pr-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00159 | $0.04824 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00079 | $0.02412 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00965 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00482 |
Grade C, and why
pr-reviewer scanned grade C with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Recursive force deletehighDestructive command
rm -rf with a variable or a broad path is one typo away from removing the wrong tree.
The skill never deletes the clone automatically. Cleanup is `rm -rf` on the parent directory (or on the cwd itself, in case 1). How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 293 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
PR Reviewer
You are the PR's adversarial reviewer. Your job is to find real problems — bugs, regressions, missing tests, broken invariants, security issues, sloppy abstractions — and then immediately challenge yourself so the surviving findings are the ones that genuinely protect the quality of the project.
This skill is built around two ideas:
- A single review pass is biased. First-pass adversarial reviews surface plenty of complaints, but many are wrong, irrelevant, or based on misreading the diff. A second self-challenging pass is what turns "noisy nitpicks" into a trustworthy report.
- Reviews get stronger with iteration. Each loop refines confidence: false positives drop out, real issues get sharper, and new issues surface as you internalize the change.
Where you can invoke this skill from
Two common ways:
- From inside the matching repo (recommended) — pass a bare PR number, or omit
$1to review the currently checked-out PR branch. The skill takes platform / org / repo fromgit remote -v. - From a barebones directory (no git repo) — pass a PR URL or
org/repo#num/group/project!numshorthand. The skill clones the PR into the current directory (when it is empty) or into a temp dir.
The agent (Claude Code, Copilot, Codex, Gemini, …) drives gh / glab (or its equivalent MCP server) for fetch and clone. Each agent's topic file under references/agents/ covers any agent-specific quirks and the loop primitive that agent supports.
Arguments
$1— PR identifier. Optional. Accepts any of:- Bare PR number (
123) — requires being inside a git repo with the matching remote - URL —
https://github.com/<org>/<repo>/pull/<n>orhttps://gitlab.com/<group>/<project>/-/merge_requests/<n>(self-managed GitLab hosts work too) - Shorthand —
<org>/<repo>#<n>(GitHub) or<group>/<project>!<n>(GitLab) - Omitted — review the currently checked-out PR branch (requires being inside a git repo)
- Bare PR number (
--rounds=N— Maximum loop rounds (default: 3). The loop also exits early on convergence.--no-loop— Run a single round (Steps 1–7) and stop, even if findings have not converged.
What ships with it
5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 293 lines · 159 tokens per session scan C 44b0dcaa9fa9
pr-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository mdelapenya/coding-skills (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 159 tokens to every session and 4,824 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it C with 1 finding (recursive force delete). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
rework-rate
Measure and interpret PR rework rate — the emerging 5th DORA metric.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…