Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to mehdic/bazinga. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mehdic/bazinga/main/.claude/skills/bazinga-validator/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mehdic/bazingaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mehdic/bazinga/bazinga-validator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mehdic/bazinga/bazinga-validator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mehdic/bazinga/bazinga-validator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mehdic/bazinga/bazinga-validator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mehdic/bazinga/bazinga-validator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00052 | $0.05984 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.02394 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.01197 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00598 |
Grade A, and why
bazinga-validator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 781 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
BAZINGA Validator Skill
You are the bazinga-validator skill. When invoked, you independently verify that all success criteria are met before accepting BAZINGA completion signal from the Project Manager.
When to Invoke This Skill
Invoke this skill when:
- Orchestrator receives BAZINGA signal from Project Manager
- Need independent verification of completion claims
- PM has marked criteria as "met" and needs validation
- Before accepting orchestration completion
Do NOT invoke when:
- PM hasn't sent BAZINGA yet
- During normal development iterations
- For interim progress checks
Your Task
When invoked, you must independently verify all success criteria and return a structured verdict.
Be brutally skeptical: Assume PM is wrong until evidence proves otherwise.
Step 1: Query Success Criteria from Database
Use the bazinga-db-workflow skill to get success criteria for this session:
Skill(command: "bazinga-db-workflow")
In the same message, provide the request:
bazinga-db-workflow, please get success criteria for session: [session_id]
Parse the response to extract:
- criterion: Description of what must be achieved
- status: PM's claimed status ("met", "blocked", "pending")
- actual: PM's claimed actual value
- evidence: PM's provided evidence
- required_for_completion: boolean
Step 2: Independent Test Verification (CONDITIONAL)
Critical: Only run tests if test-related criteria exist.
2.1: Detect Test-Related Criteria
Look for criteria containing:
- "test" + ("passing" OR "fail" OR "success")
- "all tests"
- "0 failures"
- "100% tests"
If NO test-related criteria found:
→ Skip entire Step 2 (test verification)
→ Continue to Step 3 (verify other evidence)
→ Tests are not part of requirements
→ Log: "No test criteria detected, skipping test verification"
If test-related criteria found:
→ Proceed with test verification below
→ Run tests independently
→ Count failures
→ Zero tolerance for any failures
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 781 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A 9805ad3fe1c3
bazinga-validator is a skill published in the GitHub repository mehdic/bazinga (22 stars, last pushed 9mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 5,984 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
tika-eval-compare
Compare extracts from two Tika builds over a corpus to detect regressions in content, encoding, exceptions, and embedded-document handling. Use for "compare before/after extracts", "eval this change against the corpus".
cua-driver
Use Cua Driver for desktop or browser tasks that are awkward or unavailable through Bash/APIs, or when the user explicitly wants GUI interaction: app testing, visual bug reproduction, form filling, calendar entry, screenshots, and demo recording. Also covers Cua setup; not OpenAI Codex Computer Use or web research.
jetson-validate-image
Use after jetson-flash-image to run static BSP checks, on-target smoke/regression tests on a flashed DUT, or both. Not for build or flash steps. Triggers: validate bsp, on-target validation.
atmos-validation
Validate Atmos projects, components, arbitrary JSON Schema inputs, EditorConfig, and GitHub Actions; use affected-file selection and native CI annotations.
skill-benchmark
Benchmark AI skill effectiveness by measuring implementation quality against legacy constraints.