Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add meikocho1/alchemy-marketing-skills --skill counterintuitive-testsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/meikocho1/alchemy-marketing-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/meikocho1/alchemy-marketing-skills/counterintuitive-tests)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/meikocho1/alchemy-marketing-skills/counterintuitive-tests"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/meikocho1/alchemy-marketing-skills/counterintuitive-tests/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/meikocho1/alchemy-marketing-skills/counterintuitive-tests"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/meikocho1/alchemy-marketing-skills/counterintuitive-tests.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00219 | $0.01479 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00110 | $0.00740 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00044 | $0.00296 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00148 |
Grade A, and why
counterintuitive-tests scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 62 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Counterintuitive Tests — invert the obvious, then watch behaviour
Two moves: (1) deliberately generate the ideas that sound wrong, because the sensible ideas are already taken; (2) never trust what people say about them — run a cheap, reversible experiment and watch what they do.
Why the obvious idea is the wrong default
Logical optimisation converges: every competent competitor finds the same "best practice," so it stops being an advantage. The remaining opportunities are the moves that don't survive a rational business case — which is exactly why nobody has tried them. "Doesn't make sense" is not a reason to reject an idea; it's a reason it might still be available.
- Red Bull launched a small, expensive can of bad-tasting drink. Every logical signal said fail. The "wrongness" was the positioning — it must do something.
- Raising the price sometimes raises sales (it changes the signal — see costly-signaling).
- Removing features/options/steps often beats adding them (paradox of choice).
Why you must test behaviour, not opinions
People don't think what they feel, don't say what they think, and don't do what they say.
Surveys and focus groups capture post-hoc rationalisations, not causes. Nobody in a focus group asked for Red Bull. Stated preference is cheap talk; revealed preference (what they actually clicked, bought, kept) is the only honest data. So your job isn't to ask whether the counterintuitive idea works — it's to expose people to it and measure behaviour.
How to apply
- Write the obvious solution down. The thing every competitor would do. This is your "do not just do this" baseline.
- Invert it on purpose. For each obvious move, generate its opposite and ask "under what circumstances would the opposite be better?" (Charge more. Offer less. Make it slower but nicer. Hide the price. Add friction. Remove a feature.) Keep the ones that aren't insane on inspection.
- Design a cheap, reversible test. The whole point of a counterintuitive idea is you can't reason your way to the answer — so make the experiment so cheap and reversible that you don't need to. A/B test, a soft launch to one segment, a fake-door, a landing page, one store. Small, fast, undoable.
- Measure behaviour, not approval. Define the behavioural metric before running (clicks, purchases, retention, completion). Ignore "would you…?" survey answers about the idea.
- Let surprising-but-real results win. If the illogical version beats the logical one on behaviour, ship it — even if you can't fully explain why. It doesn't have to make sense to work.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 62 lines · 219 tokens per session scan A cbddfc7cb5d2
counterintuitive-tests is a skill published in the GitHub repository meikocho1/alchemy-marketing-skills (3 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 219 tokens to every session and 1,479 once invoked, about $0.0011 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
ads-performance-analytics
How to read paid media dashboards without fooling yourself. Attribution models, platform reporting quirks, multi-platform reconciliation, ROAS vs LTV horizon traps, statistical noise in performance metrics, incrementality testing, and the failure modes that produce expensive lessons. Triggers on read paid media…
paid-media-strategy
A discipline for running paid media that does not light money on fire. Hypothesis writing for paid spend, channel selection, budget allocation, audience targeting, bid strategy, campaign types, what NOT to spend on, attribution reality, and the failure modes that produce expensive lessons. Triggers on paid media…
ecommerce-full-pipeline
An e-commerce workflow assistant covering product discovery, 1688 product collection, listing on multiple platforms, promotional copy, and short-video creation. 1688 is a Chinese online wholesale marketplace.
absolute-spec
Lightweight standalone design spec for AI coding agents: codebase scan → bounded clarify pass (3–5 questions, not a grill) → reviewed design doc written to docs/plans/ → independent scored review → stop. No task board, no build. Use when you want a spec to discuss, hand off, or review before committing to…
yandex-direct-manager
A workflow for creating Yandex Direct advertising campaigns, including keyword research, grouping, exclusions, ad writing, goal setup, bidding, and draft upload. Yandex Direct is Yandex's online advertising platform, and a draft is not yet live.
marketing-strategist
A planning workflow for preparing paid advertising campaigns across platforms such as Yandex.Direct, VK Ads, Meta, Telegram, and TikTok.