Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add melodic-software/claude-code-plugins --skill eli5git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/melodic-software/claude-code-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins/eli5)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins/eli5"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins/eli5/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins/eli5"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins/eli5.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00155 | $0.02064 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00062 | $0.00826 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00031 | $0.00413 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00206 |
Grade A, and why
eli5 scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 17d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 155 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Purpose
Explain one thing as a picture, for a reader assumed to know nothing about it.
The output contract is fixed: a visual HTML explainer that assumes zero prior
knowledge: one idea per diagram, minimal text. That contract is what makes this a
distinct lane rather than a second prose explainer. education:explain drops
altitude and stays in prose; this skill changes the medium, and its floor does
not move on request.
The upstream community eli5 plugin writes a page that does not pass through the escape
helper, so this skill builds every page itself.
Step 1. Ground the object before drawing it
A diagram of a thing you recalled wrongly is a confident, beautiful, wrong answer. Re-read the actual artifact this turn. What that means depends on the object:
| Object | Grounding pre-pass |
|---|---|
| A module, file, or subsystem | Read the code. Follow its imports and its callers far enough to know what it actually does, not what its name suggests. |
| A tradeoff or design decision | Read the ADRs, the git history, and the pull-request discussion where it was argued. The reasoning lives in the debate, not the result. |
| An incident | Read the writeup and the logs. Reconstruct the sequence before drawing the causal chain. |
| A general concept | Fetch a primary source. Do not draw from parametric memory. |
If the grounding pass cannot be done (no access, no such artifact), say so and ask, rather than drawing a plausible diagram of something you did not read.
Step 2. No delegation
Build the page with this skill, whether or not the upstream eli5 plugin is installed.
Step 1 hands this skill repository text or a fetched web page, both untrusted, and the
upstream skill writes its own page, which does not pass through the escape helper.
Do not invoke it, and do not print an install recipe for it.
Step 3. The inline pass
Build the explainer directly, to the same contract.
- One idea per diagram. If a diagram needs a paragraph to be read, it is two diagrams.
- Diagram first, prose second. Each diagram carries a one-line takeaway caption saying what the reader should conclude from it. The caption is the point; the surrounding text is scaffolding.
- Demote the identifiers. Real function, file, and service names belong in parentheses or monospace, after the plain-words version of what the thing does. A zero-knowledge reader cannot use a name they have never seen as the subject of a sentence.
- Diagrams are boxes and arrows. Each diagram is a
flow(boxes joined by arrows) or astack(boxes one above the next), listed assteps. Build a system up across several small diagrams, each adding one box, rather than one crowded diagram. - Name the styles to leave out. The builder's stylesheet has no italic accent words in headings, numbered "01 / 02 / 03" section labels, or pill-shaped badges. The look is fixed: when the user dislikes it, say so rather than hand-writing a replacement page.
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 17d ago Changed · -14 lines · -10 tokens per session effbf4f98dae
- 26d ago Changed · +5 lines ee92a77b2e45
- 1mo ago Changed · -1 lines · -14 tokens per session e6c57f2adbb2
- 1mo ago First seen · 165 lines · 179 tokens per session scan A db2d7fca2519
eli5 is a skill published in the GitHub repository melodic-software/claude-code-plugins (26 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 155 tokens to every session and 2,064 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
solve-constraint-puzzle
For constraint satisfaction: Sudoku, scheduling, N-queens, logic puzzles, SAT-like problems, assignment problems. Uses propagate-then-search pattern.
count-combinations
For probability and counting: permutations, combinations, sample spaces, Monte Carlo simulation, brute-force enumeration, card/dice problems.
career-path-planner
Career goal mapping with skill gap analysis, actionable development plans, and milestone tracking. Use when planning career transitions, identifying skill gaps, setting professional development goals, or evaluating career options.
learning-gap-analyzer
Map understanding, identify knowledge gaps, and build targeted learning plans with spaced repetition. Use when assessing knowledge levels, designing study plans, or optimizing learning paths.
parallel-orchestrator
Manage parallel Claude Code workstreams using git worktrees. Use when: splitting large tasks across multiple workers, coordinating parallel development, monitoring worker progress, integrating completed work, analyzing work item documents (code reviews, issue lists). Triggers: parallel, orchestrator, worktrees…
parallel-worker
Execute focused implementation tasks in a parallel workflow. Use when: working on assigned files in a worktree, making checkpoint commits, signaling dependencies or blockers, completing orchestrator-assigned tasks. Triggers: worker, checkpoint, worktree, assigned scope, commit prefix, parallel task.