assess-quality

assess-quality is a skill for Claude Code from mendixlabs/mxcli. It costs 54 tokens per session (4,300 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A review of a Mendix app, where Mendix is a platform for building business software with visual models. It checks the app's structure and code against recommended practices and gives scored results.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it for a project health check, a pre-release review, or an initial assessment when joining a Mendix project.
Why use it?
It helps find naming, security, speed, maintenance, architecture, and design problems before release or while learning an unfamiliar app.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/. Also seen: mentions Claude Code.

Good fit Use it for a project health check, a pre-release review, or an initial assessment when joining a Mendix project.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/mendixlabs/mxcli/assess-quality
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add mendixlabs/mxcli --skill assess-quality
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mendixlabs/mxcli

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for assess-quality

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mendixlabs/mxcli/assess-quality/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mendixlabs/mxcli/assess-quality)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mendixlabs/mxcli/assess-quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mendixlabs/mxcli/assess-quality/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for assess-quality

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mendixlabs/mxcli/assess-quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mendixlabs/mxcli/assess-quality.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 54 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 4,300 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00054 $0.04300
Opus 5.5 $0.00022 $0.01720
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00011 $0.00860
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00430

Measured 3d ago against content hash f1e41508f36d, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

assess-quality scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/mendix/assess-quality/SKILL.md · 448 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 448 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Find it fast

sed -n '<from>,<to>p' SKILL.md one section rather than reading the file; ./mxcli syntax <topic> answers how do I write this for a fraction of either.

lines section
29-36 When to Use This Skill
37-96 Assessment Workflow
97-352 Quality Guidelines Reference
353-363 Assessment Report Template
364-376 Executive Summary
377-387 project Metrics
388-400 Automated Findings
401-420 Manual Review Findings
421-436 Recommendations
437-447 Sources

Assess Mendix Project Quality

This skill guides a comprehensive quality assessment of a Mendix project, evaluating it against established best practices across naming, security, performance, maintainability, architecture, and more.

When to Use This Skill

Use this skill when:

  • A user asks to evaluate the quality of a Mendix project
  • Reviewing a project against best practices before go-live
  • Performing a health check or audit on an existing application
  • Onboarding onto a project and wanting to understand its quality posture

Assessment Workflow

Step 1: Run Automated Analysis

Run the automated linter and report to get a baseline score:

# connect to the project and build a full catalog (needed for deep analysis)
mxcli -p app.mpr -c "refresh catalog full"

# run the linter (41 rules: MDL, SEC, QUAL, ARCH, design, CONV series)
mxcli lint -p app.mpr

# generate the scored best practices report
mxcli report -p app.mpr --format markdown

# score only the app's own modules (not Marketplace / platform modules)
mxcli report -p app.mpr --modules MyModule,OtherModule --format markdown

The report covers 6 categories with scores: Naming, Security, Quality, Architecture, Performance, Design.

Step 2: Explore Project Structure

Use catalog queries to understand the project's shape:

-- Overview of project size and structure
describe structure depth 2;

-- Key metrics
select module_name, count(*) from CATALOG.entities GROUP by module_name;
select module_name, count(*) from CATALOG.microflows GROUP by module_name;
select module_name, count(*) from CATALOG.pages GROUP by module_name;

-- Complexity metrics (McCabe/Sigrid-style)
select qualified_name, cyclomatic_complexity
from CATALOG.microflows
where cyclomatic_complexity > 10
ORDER by cyclomatic_complexity desc;

-- Large microflows
select qualified_name, activity_count
from CATALOG.microflows
where activity_count > 15
ORDER by activity_count desc;

Read the full file on GitHub · 448 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago Changed · +1 lines f1e41508f36d
  2. 5d ago Changed · +19 lines 338f24e6ed77
  3. 6d ago Changed · +1 lines b5330f308672
  4. 13d ago Changed · +3 lines e3e0ec609796
  5. 14d ago Changed 2efacd4ad91a
  6. 15d ago Changed 74472d62dd25
  7. 1mo ago First seen · 424 lines · 54 tokens per session scan A 142cbd5d1a1c

Subscribe to this mod's changes

assess-quality is a skill published in the GitHub repository mendixlabs/mxcli (130 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 54 tokens to every session and 4,300 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

simplify

Review recent code changes for reuse, code quality, and efficiency, then directly apply straightforward cleanup improvements. Use when the user wants a post-implementation cleanup pass, pre-PR polish, or asks to simplify/refine recent changes. Invoke with /simplify or /simplify .

QwenLM/qwen-code · 63 tokens

triage

Gatekeep and review GitHub issues and pull requests for Qwen Code maintainers. Use for GitHub Action issue triage, PR admission checks, product-direction review, KISS-focused PR review, and staged bilingual GitHub comments.

QwenLM/qwen-code · 50 tokens

autofix

Review and repair current local changes until they converge, or run Qwen Code Autofix issue and review workflows from GitHub Actions.

QwenLM/qwen-code · 30 tokens

find-simplifications

Use for a periodic repo-wide sweep of qwen-code for accumulated excess surface — dead components and files, orphaned locale keys, exports nothing consumes, added-then-removed scaffolding — filing candidates on a tracking issue and landing only what a maintainer has said yes to. Repo-wide and evidence-first; every…

QwenLM/qwen-code · 103 tokens

code-clean

Cut dead code and over-long comments from termio's Swift, verifying every deletion against a build. Knows this repo's real failure mode (essay-length doc comments, not restated-code slop) and periphery's four known false-positive shapes. Invoke when the user says 'clean dead code', 'clean up the comments', 'the…

termio-sh/termio · 110 tokens

pr-council-review

Multi-dimensional LLM council review of an open PR (default) or a local feature branch (§ 8 branch mode, invoked via /gflow:branch-review). Five baseline dimensions (correctness, quality, security, tests, memory-hygiene) plus adaptive dimensions per surface (transports / data / CLI / docs / auth / BDD / scripts /…

ffroliva/gflow-cli · 125 tokens