Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add mercuryPark/oc-setup --skill testinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mercuryPark/oc-setupWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mercurypark/oc-setup/testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mercurypark/oc-setup/testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mercurypark/oc-setup/testing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mercurypark/oc-setup/testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mercurypark/oc-setup/testing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00028 | $0.00132 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00053 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00026 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00013 |
Grade A, and why
testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Testing Guide
Principles
- 각 테스트는 하나의 동작만 검증
- Given-When-Then 패턴
- 테스트 간 의존성 금지
- Mock은 최소한으로
Naming
- test("should [expected behavior] when [condition]")
Structure
- unit: 개별 함수/컴포넌트
- integration: 모듈 간 상호작용
- e2e: 사용자 시나리오
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 20 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A 3e08d024bf9b
testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository mercuryPark/oc-setup (2 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 132 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
rust-testing
Rust testing patterns including unit tests, integration tests, async testing, property-based testing, mocking, and coverage. Follows TDD methodology.
cpp-testing
Use only when writing/updating/fixing C++ tests, configuring GoogleTest/CTest, diagnosing failing or flaky tests, or adding coverage/sanitizers.
write-vibe-tests
Write or refactor Mistral Vibe tests with proper decoupling. Use when adding behavior coverage, testing ports/adapters, replacing brittle mocks, creating fakes, adding characterization tests before refactors, or changing tests under tests/ for vibe/core, vibe/appserver, vibe/acp, tools, config, sessions, skills…
principle-test-behavior-not-implementation
Apply when you write, change, or keep a test. Assert what the code's users can observe, so that the test fails when that behavior breaks and keeps passing when only the internals change.
composing-matchers
Build compound Gomega assertions by combining matchers — And/SatisfyAll (all pass), Or/SatisfyAny (any pass), Not (negate), WithTransform to map the actual before matching, Satisfy for an ad-hoc predicate, HaveValue to dereference pointers/interfaces, HaveField for struct fields and method results, HaveEach for every…
spec-driven-tests
Rebuild a package's unit test suite around a behavior specification (SPEC.md) derived from the implementation, with every test citing a numbered rule ID. Use when asked to do a spec-driven test rebuild, write a SPEC.md for a package, repeat the state or store spec process (PRs.