Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add metago-ai/metagolifeform --skill metago-completeness-guardgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/metago-ai/metagolifeformWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-completeness-guard)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-completeness-guard"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-completeness-guard/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-completeness-guard"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-completeness-guard.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00107 | $0.00958 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00053 | $0.00479 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00021 | $0.00192 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00096 |
Grade A, and why
metago-completeness-guard scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
元构完整性治理（MetaGO Completeness Guard）
核心原则（不可违反）
- 完整性 = 基线覆盖全绿，不是主观断言——宣称完整前必须运行验证，输出覆盖报告；
- 缺口可见——所有未覆盖项必须登记（可见的缺口优于隐藏的完美），不存在"没发现=没有"；
- 声明纪律——禁止使用禁用词：
绝对完整 / 100%完美 / 100%完整 / 不会再缺 / 不可能有遗漏；标准声明格式："当前基线（Vx，N 项）覆盖全绿 + 已知缺口 M 项已登记"
- 基线是活的——新框架/新标准/新功能 →
baseline add纳入基线 → 重新验证； - 完整性是持续治理——定期
radar check扫描行业/竞品/元构升级，不是一次达成。
操作流程（强制按序）
- 初始化：
completeness-guard init --target <项目目录>（生成配置 + 缺口登记册 + 雷达档案） - 验证：
completeness-guard verify --doc <文档路径>——全绿（exit 0）才允许宣称完整；有缺口 → 补齐或登记后重跑 - 登记缺口：
completeness-guard gaps add "<缺口描述>" --source <来源> --plan <计划>（来源：用户/雷达/自审） - 雷达：
completeness-guard radar check——过期则按观察清单扫描行业新标准/竞品新功能/元构升级，发现 →gaps add或baseline add - 声明：
completeness-guard declaration --doc <路径>——生成标准声明（替代"我做完了一切都完整"式断言）
强制门（安装后自动生效）
- PreToolUse 拦截：输出含禁用声明词时返回拦截（hooks 已配置时）；
- Stop 触发：会话结束时若存在未验证交付，生成提醒；
- CLI 门禁：
completeness-guard verify失败 exit 1——CI 可接入，失败即阻断发布。
配置要点
completeness.config.json：target（文档路径/版本）、baselines（启用基线）、enforcement（强制等级/禁用词/hooks）、radar（扫描周期）、gaps（登记册路径）；- 自定义基线：
completeness-guard baseline add <组> <条目> <关键词...>或编辑baselines/user-custom.json。
与本技能配套的资产
- CLI：
completeness-guard（verify/init/baseline/gaps/radar/declaration/check-text） - 基线：B1 权威框架 / B2 行业标配 / B3 协议标准 / B4 自解剖 / B5 元构法则 / B6 竞品对标 / B7 用户自定义
- 本技能即"软强制层"（教会 Agent 遵守）；hooks 为"硬强制层"（不可绕过）。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 46 lines · 107 tokens per session scan A 00f294ce9f4c
metago-completeness-guard is a skill published in the GitHub repository metago-ai/metagolifeform (4 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 107 tokens to every session and 958 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
kanban-board
A Kanban board is a visual task list with columns for stages such as To do, In progress, In review, and Done. It can show filters, labels, due dates, assignees, comments, and swimlanes that group cards.
team-okrs
An OKR tracking page for a quarter. OKRs, or objectives and key results, are goals paired with measurable results.
ops-desk
Operate a project, workspace, or account from an agent or manager dashboard: inspect state, triage risks, prepare governed actions, route to the right skill lane, require approvals for consequential acts, and verify receipts after execution.
business-ops
Route one business signal through a replayable governed ops graph: classify, docs, release, work, outreach, spend, and proof, with consequential actions stopping at the right gate.
work-plan
Compile a bounded objective or issue-intake change set into a dependency-safe Runx execution plan, with deterministic checks for evidence preservation, mutation boundaries, catalog references, and skill-package ownership. Use before multi-step or cross-surface work; this skill plans but does not execute.
operator-inbox
Maintain a provider-neutral local action queue from bounded provider observations and explicit human dispositions.