Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add metago-ai/metagolifeform --skill metago-completeness-guardgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/metago-ai/metagolifeformWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-completeness-guard)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-completeness-guard"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-completeness-guard/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-completeness-guard"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-completeness-guard.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00107 | $0.00958 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00043 | $0.00383 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00192 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00096 |
Grade A, and why
metago-completeness-guard scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
元构完整性治理（MetaGO Completeness Guard）
核心原则（不可违反）
- 完整性 = 基线覆盖全绿，不是主观断言——宣称完整前必须运行验证，输出覆盖报告；
- 缺口可见——所有未覆盖项必须登记（可见的缺口优于隐藏的完美），不存在"没发现=没有"；
- 声明纪律——禁止使用禁用词：
绝对完整 / 100%完美 / 100%完整 / 不会再缺 / 不可能有遗漏；标准声明格式："当前基线（Vx，N 项）覆盖全绿 + 已知缺口 M 项已登记"
- 基线是活的——新框架/新标准/新功能 →
baseline add纳入基线 → 重新验证； - 完整性是持续治理——定期
radar check扫描行业/竞品/元构升级，不是一次达成。
操作流程（强制按序）
- 初始化：
completeness-guard init --target <项目目录>（生成配置 + 缺口登记册 + 雷达档案） - 验证：
completeness-guard verify --doc <文档路径>——全绿（exit 0）才允许宣称完整；有缺口 → 补齐或登记后重跑 - 登记缺口：
completeness-guard gaps add "<缺口描述>" --source <来源> --plan <计划>（来源：用户/雷达/自审） - 雷达：
completeness-guard radar check——过期则按观察清单扫描行业新标准/竞品新功能/元构升级，发现 →gaps add或baseline add - 声明：
completeness-guard declaration --doc <路径>——生成标准声明（替代"我做完了一切都完整"式断言）
强制门（安装后自动生效）
- PreToolUse 拦截：输出含禁用声明词时返回拦截（hooks 已配置时）；
- Stop 触发：会话结束时若存在未验证交付，生成提醒；
- CLI 门禁：
completeness-guard verify失败 exit 1——CI 可接入，失败即阻断发布。
配置要点
completeness.config.json：target（文档路径/版本）、baselines（启用基线）、enforcement（强制等级/禁用词/hooks）、radar（扫描周期）、gaps（登记册路径）；- 自定义基线：
completeness-guard baseline add <组> <条目> <关键词...>或编辑baselines/user-custom.json。
与本技能配套的资产
- CLI：
completeness-guard（verify/init/baseline/gaps/radar/declaration/check-text） - 基线：B1 权威框架 / B2 行业标配 / B3 协议标准 / B4 自解剖 / B5 元构法则 / B6 竞品对标 / B7 用户自定义
- 本技能即"软强制层"（教会 Agent 遵守）；hooks 为"硬强制层"（不可绕过）。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 46 lines · 107 tokens per session scan A 00f294ce9f4c
metago-completeness-guard is a skill published in the GitHub repository metago-ai/metagolifeform (5 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 107 tokens to every session and 958 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
todo-for-ai-agent-runtime
Runtime integration skill for external agents connecting to Todo for AI over HTTP API Token / Agent Key, including auth, task lease, events, commit, and task logs.
parallel-feature-development
Coordinate parallel feature development with file ownership strategies, conflict avoidance rules, and integration patterns for multi-agent implementation. Use this skill when decomposing a large feature into independent work streams, when two or more agents need to implement different layers of the same system…
bazel-build-optimization
Optimize Bazel builds for large-scale monorepos. Use when configuring Bazel, implementing remote execution, or optimizing build performance for enterprise codebases.
track-management
Use this skill when creating, managing, or working with Conductor tracks - the logical work units for features, bugs, and refactors. Applies to spec.md, plan.md, and track lifecycle operations.
feedback-page-generator
Deprecated compatibility entry for Feedback Page construction. This page is now maintained in Pagina; install and use page-builder to build a new Feedback Page.
feature-decision
Framework for making feature prioritization decisions.