Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add mfmezger/ai_agent_dotfiles --skill karpathy-guidelinesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mfmezger/ai_agent_dotfilesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mfmezger/ai_agent_dotfiles/karpathy-guidelines)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mfmezger/ai_agent_dotfiles/karpathy-guidelines"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mfmezger/ai_agent_dotfiles/karpathy-guidelines/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mfmezger/ai_agent_dotfiles/karpathy-guidelines"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mfmezger/ai_agent_dotfiles/karpathy-guidelines.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00046 | $0.00565 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00282 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00113 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00056 |
Grade A, and why
karpathy-guidelines scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
91% identical to andrej-karpathy — 71 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 73 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Karpathy Guidelines
Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes, derived from Andrej Karpathy's observations on LLM coding pitfalls.
Tradeoff: These guidelines bias toward caution over speed. For trivial tasks, use judgment.
1. Think Before Coding
Don't assume. Don't hide confusion. Surface tradeoffs.
Before implementing:
- State your assumptions explicitly. If uncertain, ask.
- If multiple interpretations exist, present them - don't pick silently.
- If a simpler approach exists, say so. Push back when warranted.
- If something is unclear, stop. Name what's confusing. Ask.
2. Simplicity First
Minimum code that solves the problem. Nothing speculative.
- No features beyond what was asked.
- No abstractions for single-use code.
- No "flexibility" or "configurability" that wasn't requested.
- No error handling for impossible scenarios.
- If you write 200 lines and it could be 50, rewrite it.
Ask yourself: "Would a senior engineer say this is overcomplicated?" If yes, simplify.
3. Surgical Changes
Touch only what you must. Clean up only your own mess.
When editing existing code:
- Don't "improve" adjacent code, comments, or formatting.
- Don't refactor things that aren't broken.
- Match existing style, even if you'd do it differently.
- If you notice unrelated dead code, mention it - don't delete it.
When your changes create orphans:
- Remove imports/variables/functions that YOUR changes made unused.
- Don't remove pre-existing dead code unless asked.
The test: Every changed line should trace directly to the user's request.
4. Goal-Driven Execution
Define success criteria. Loop until verified.
Transform tasks into verifiable goals:
- "Add validation" → "Write tests for invalid inputs, then make them pass"
- "Fix the bug" → "Write a test that reproduces it, then make it pass"
- "Refactor X" → "Ensure tests pass before and after"
For multi-step tasks, state a brief plan:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 73 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A ada2bbcebc34
karpathy-guidelines is a skill published in the GitHub repository mfmezger/ai_agent_dotfiles (5 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 565 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 91% identical to andrej-karpathy, differing in 71 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
embedded-dev
Use when developing firmware on ESP32/STM32/RP2040/nRF52, experiencing DMA overflow, SPI timeout, LCD blank display, frame corruption, GPIO conflicts, sensor reading errors, Wi-Fi disconnect, or needing driver configuration, hardware debugging, display/GUI setup, protocol implementation, serial monitoring. Use even if…
embedded-dev
Guide for embedded systems development on ESP32, STM32, RP2040, nRF52 chips. Use this skill whenever the user mentions embedded systems, firmware development, MCU programming, hardware drivers, sensors, LCD displays, IMU devices, SPI/I2C/UART interfaces, compilation, debugging, remote monitoring, Wi-Fi/BLE/MQTT…
embedded-gui-feedback
Use for LCD/GUI projects after verification passes - captures display via camera, analyzes layout/font/color, detects display issues.
embedded-driver-design
Use when hardware configuration confirmed - creates detailed implementation plan with bite-sized tasks, exact file paths, complete code steps.
embedded-verification
Use after implementation complete - runs build-flash-monitor loop, verifies runtime behavior, no completion claims without fresh evidence.
embedded-brainstorming
Use before any embedded development - explores hardware requirements, confirms configuration, validates feasibility, saves design spec.