Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to MHaggis/Security-Detections-MCP. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/MHaggis/Security-Detections-MCP/main/.claude/skills/coverage-analysis/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MHaggis/Security-Detections-MCPWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mhaggis/security-detections-mcp/coverage-analysis)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mhaggis/security-detections-mcp/coverage-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mhaggis/security-detections-mcp/coverage-analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mhaggis/security-detections-mcp/coverage-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mhaggis/security-detections-mcp/coverage-analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.00496 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00198 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00099 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00050 |
Grade A, and why
detection-coverage-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 76 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A 69d95778753b
detection-coverage-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository MHaggis/Security-Detections-MCP (502 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 496 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
detecting-evasion-techniques-in-endpoint-logs
Detects defense evasion techniques used by adversaries in endpoint logs including log tampering, timestomping, process injection, and security tool disabling. Use when investigating suspicious endpoint behavior, building detection rules for evasion tactics, or conducting threat hunting for stealthy adversary activity.…
configuring-windows-event-logging-for-detection
Configures Windows Event Logging with advanced audit policies to generate high-fidelity security events for threat detection and forensic investigation. Use when enabling audit policies for logon events, process creation, privilege use, and object access to feed SIEM detection rules. Activates for requests involving…
detecting-fileless-attacks-on-endpoints
Detects fileless malware and in-memory attacks that execute entirely in RAM without writing persistent files to disk, evading traditional antivirus. Use when building detections for PowerShell-based attacks, reflective DLL injection, WMI persistence, and registry-resident malware. Activates for requests involving…
agent-artifact-catalog
Research, author, and validate AI agent artifact catalog entries documenting the forensic artifacts AI agents leave on endpoints - install paths, config and credential files, MCP server configs, listening ports, process trees, registry keys, and the Windows event log records that prove a tool ran. Use this skill…
building-detection-rule-with-splunk-spl
Build effective detection rules using Splunk Search Processing Language (SPL) correlation searches to identify security threats in SOC environments.
implementing-alert-fatigue-reduction
Implements strategies to reduce SOC alert fatigue by tuning detection rules, consolidating duplicate alerts, implementing risk-based alerting, and measuring alert quality metrics to maintain analyst effectiveness and prevent critical alert dismissal. Use when SOC teams face overwhelming alert volumes, high false…