Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add mhmdreza-rafiei/agent-tools --skill scaffoldgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mhmdreza-rafiei/agent-toolsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mhmdreza-rafiei/agent-tools/scaffold)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mhmdreza-rafiei/agent-tools/scaffold"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mhmdreza-rafiei/agent-tools/scaffold/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mhmdreza-rafiei/agent-tools/scaffold"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mhmdreza-rafiei/agent-tools/scaffold.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00077 | $0.00694 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00031 | $0.00278 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00139 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00069 |
Grade A, and why
scaffold scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 75 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/scaffold
Lay down the skeleton of a feature in one pass so the implementer starts at the logic, not the boilerplate. Scaffold reads the project's existing conventions and mimics them — naming, layout, test runner, doc style.
When to use
After /spec and /architect, before the real implementation; when the
user says "scaffold " or "stub "; on /scaffold.
Commands
/scaffold <feature>— scaffold a named feature./scaffold <feature> --type <api|cli|ui|lib>— hint the shape./scaffold --dry-run— print the file list without writing.
Step 1 — Read the project's conventions
- Find a neighbor module of the same kind and copy its: file layout, naming (snake_case / camelCase), test runner + location, doc style, export style.
- Detect the language/framework from the manifest.
- If no clear neighbor, ask once which convention to follow.
Step 2 — Plan the file set
A feature skeleton usually includes (omit what doesn't apply):
- Module — the entry file (empty or with the type signature +
TODO). - Types — a types file if the language separates them.
- Tests stub — one passing trivial test + one
TODOtest, so the runner is wired. - Docs stub — a one-line module doc + a
TODOfor the real doc. - Registration — wire the new module into the index/router/CLI as the project expects.
Step 3 — Write + verify
- Write the files using the detected conventions.
- Run the test stub to confirm the runner sees it (one passing trivial test).
- Run the linter/typecheck if present.
Output
- The skeleton files, committed per
git-workflowasfeat(<feature>): scaffold skeleton. - A passing trivial test proving the runner is wired.
Constraints
- Mimic existing conventions; do not introduce a new pattern.
- Stubs only — no real logic. The implementer fills the
TODOs. - One passing trivial test, not a real test suite.
- Follow
rule/files-folders-structurefor paths.
Related artifacts
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 75 lines · 77 tokens per session scan A cc53780f4b7f
scaffold is a skill published in the GitHub repository mhmdreza-rafiei/agent-tools (5 stars, last pushed 15d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 77 tokens to every session and 694 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
ag-pipeline-issue
Pipeline Issue→SPEC→Build→Verify→Test. Toda GitHub Issue gera SPEC antes de implementar, e toda implementacao e verificada contra a SPEC e testada. Use when starting work on a GitHub Issue.
ds-build
Plan executor — take an issue, a specs/{feature}/tasks.md, or a plain request and implement it unit by unit with a verify signal per unit, red-proven tests, budgeted backtracking, and a code-proven close. Use when the plan exists and the work is to be done, not planned.
project-setup
Bootstrap new projects with strong typing, linting, formatting, and testing. Supports Python, TypeScript, and other languages with research fallback.
bmad-agent-dev
Senior software engineer for story execution and code implementation. Use when the user asks to talk to Amelia or requests the developer agent.
test-master
Generates test files, creates mocking strategies, analyzes code coverage, designs test architectures, and produces test plans and defect reports across functional, performance, and security testing disciplines. Use when writing unit tests, integration tests, or E2E tests; creating test strategies or automation…
migrate-xunit-to-xunit-v3
Migrate .NET test projects from xUnit.net v2 to xunit.v3 and fix v3 breaks. Use for package/CPM conversion, OutputType=Exe, preserving the VSTest or MTP runner (including projects currently using YTest.MTP.XUnit2), incompatible TFMs, async void tests, string-to-Type attributes, custom Fact/Theory/BeforeAfterTest…