Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add sungurerdim/dev-skills --skill ds-buildgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sungurerdim/dev-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sungurerdim/dev-skills/ds-build)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sungurerdim/dev-skills/ds-build"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sungurerdim/dev-skills/ds-build/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sungurerdim/dev-skills/ds-build"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sungurerdim/dev-skills/ds-build.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00068 | $0.04022 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.02011 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00804 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00402 |
Grade A, and why
ds-build scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 166 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/ds-build
A plan is not progress. Handing an AI a task list produces half-implemented units, "done" claims with no signal behind them, and a tree nobody can bisect. This skill takes a source of work — a GitHub issue, a specs/{feature}/tasks.md, or a plain request — and executes it one bounded unit at a time, each proven by its own verify command before the next starts, then closes the record with the evidence.
Plan Executor — intake → re-verify → impact map → bounded units → red proof → aggregate gate → code-proven close.
Completion Evidence — applies to every phase: Report
done/OKonly with the machine-checkable evidence the gates name — the exact command run and its observed output (orfile:linediff). Missing evidence → reportINCOMPLETEplus what is missing. Self-assessment is never evidence. (This band repeats at file end by design — both copies are normative.)
Triggers
- User runs
/ds-build - User says "implement this plan", "execute the tasks", "do issue #N", "build the feature in the spec"
- A
specs/{feature}/tasks.mdwith unchecked tasks exists and the user asks to proceed /ds-issue --do, ds-pipeline (after tasks are generated) or ds-freeze (kept set) hand execution here
Triggers — INVOKE / DON'T INVOKE
| INVOKE | DON'T INVOKE |
|---|---|
| "execute specs/001-x/tasks.md", "implement the plan" | "turn this idea into a plan" (→ ds-pipeline) |
| "do issue #42 end to end" | "file an issue for this" (→ ds-issue intake) |
| "build the kept set from the freeze" | "decide what ships now vs later" (→ ds-freeze) |
| "this bug — reproduce and fix it" → only when the fix is planned; otherwise | "find why this fails" (→ ds-debug) |
| "add the feature described in the request" | "write tests for X" alone (→ ds-test) |
Contract
Dimensions: none (carrier)
- Executes work; never plans a feature from scratch (a plain request is normalized into a one-line goal + files + done criteria, not a spec) and never decides scope (that is ds-freeze's job).
- Standalone. Sources: a GitHub issue (via
gh), aspecs/{feature}/tasks.md, or the request text. The shared loop it runs is ../core/execution-loop.md; this file adds only the executor-specific rules. - Full accounting enforced: every finding and planned check ends in an explicit disposition (fixed / skipped + reason / only you can do); summary totals balance.
- Pre-existing / out-of-scope errors detected during work are NOT skipped — fixed inline or escalated with concrete blocker.
- Every unit has a signal. A task without a runnable verify command gets one before any edit (stack-native check from ../core/toolchains.md, a test, or an observable effect); "looks right" is not a signal.
- Checkpoint (../core/checkpoint-protocol.md):
git status --porcelainbefore the first write; a dirty path the plan would touch → that unit isonly you can do(commit or stash first); disjoint dirt is listed and left alone. Failed units are reverted file-by-file (git checkout -- {files}), never with a tree-wide reset. - Mechanical Done Gate:
{check-cmd}resolved at setup (priority: ds-quality enforcement arm, profileToolchain:, stack-native format → lint → type → test), baseline captured, re-run after every unit and once in aggregate before close; new red → fix ≤ 3 attempts with the same command, then revert the unit and recordreverted; baseline red reported red-at-baseline; no tooling → Verification-Infrastructure Gap surfaced, never skipped. - Budgeted backtracking: ≤ 3 fix attempts per approach, ≤ 3 approaches per unit; every failed attempt records
{approach} failed because {root cause}; all approaches exhausted → unitblockedwith the recorded causes, dependent units re-planned, never a fourth identical retry. - Publishing is never done here: commits are local; push, PR, tag, release, deploy are on the exception list (../core/ask-exception-list.md) and reported
only you can dowith the exact command. - State-exempt: the record (issue body,
tasks.mdticks, commits) is durable outside the run; a resumed run re-reads it.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 166 lines · 68 tokens per session scan A 0ef6fbdafdad
ds-build is a skill published in the GitHub repository sungurerdim/dev-skills (1 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 68 tokens to every session and 4,022 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
ring:implementing-tasks
Implementing a single planned task (Task N.M.T) end-to-end: selects the right backend agent by language and service type, drives one TDD RED->GREEN turn, then verifies coverage, lint, license headers, runtime, and delivery before handoff. Runs as Gate 0 before ring:reviewing-code. Use to drive ONE task inside an…
ring:validating-acceptance-criteria
Validating a completed task against its acceptance criteria, mapping each AC to evidence, and gating completion on explicit user sign-off (self-approval prohibited). Gate 5 of ring:running-dev-cycle / ring:running-dev-cycle-frontend, run at task cadence after ring:reviewing-code. Use when implementation and tests are…
execution/testing-executor
Internal: Testing Executor. Writes unit, integration, and e2e tests. Read spec and segment. Write evidence on completion.
test-rules
Run rules against pass/fail fixtures using the local CLI test harness.
go-testing
Trigger: Go tests, go test coverage, Bubbletea teatest, golden files. Apply focused Go testing patterns.
memstack-development-test-writer
Use this skill when the user says 'write tests', 'add tests', 'test coverage', 'unit tests', 'integration tests', 'component tests', 'mocking', 'edge cases', or needs to generate tests with proper mocking and edge case coverage. Do NOT use for refactoring plans or database migrations.