pstack-claude is a set of opinionated coding-agent skills and workflows ported from Cursor to Claude Code, Codex, Pi, and other agent harnesses. It guides agents toward concise, simple, and verified code by routing goals to suitable workflows and supporting subagent tools. The catalogue entries are the project's skills, agents, hook, and plugin implementations for these agent environments.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add michael-denyer/pstack-claude --skill blast-radiusgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/michael-denyer/pstack-claudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/michael-denyer/pstack-claude/blast-radius)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/michael-denyer/pstack-claude/blast-radius"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/michael-denyer/pstack-claude/blast-radius/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/michael-denyer/pstack-claude/blast-radius"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/michael-denyer/pstack-claude/blast-radius.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- Socket pass
- Snyk warn
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00087 | $0.00961 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00035 | $0.00384 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00192 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00096 |
Grade A, and why
blast-radius scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
8 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- blast-radius — 95% identical, 5 lines differ
- blast-radius — 95% identical, 21 lines differ
- blast-radius — 95% identical, 19 lines differ
- blast-radius — 95% identical, 19 lines differ
- blast-radius — 92% identical, 39 lines differ
- blast-radius — 91% identical, 5 lines differ
- blast-radius — 89% identical, 18 lines differ
- blast-radius — 89% identical, 5 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 50 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Blast radius
Find what a change breaks somewhere else, before it ships. Use for "blast radius of X", "what could this break", or reviewing a small diff you don't trust yet. Run it before design, not only before shipping, when a brief asserts something about existing code ("make endpoint X public"): the assertion is a hypothesis, and the consumer census is what decides the design.
Companion to how and why. how tells you what the code does. why tells you why it's shaped that way. Blast radius tells you what it breaks somewhere else.
Listing the callers is not the job. The agent can grep those in a second. The job is the breakage grep won't show you.
Don't trust your own writeup
A blast-radius writeup that sounds right is worthless. It reads as convincing whether or not it's true. So don't hand back the writeup. Find the one or two facts the whole thing depends on and prove them by running code.
How sure are you
For each fact the change's safety depends on, get it as far down this list as is cheap, and say where it stopped.
- You said so. Worthless on its own.
- You pointed at the line. A real
file:line, or the library's own source. - You showed the bad case can't happen. You walked the failure step by step and it doesn't reach.
- You ran it. A script or test that calls the real code and fails loud if you're wrong.
- You reproduced it in the running app.
Step 4 is usually one small script that imports the same library the app ships and calls the exact function you're worried about.
Steps
- Read the change. The diff, the symbols it adds, changes, and deletes, and what it now does differently, including the part the diff doesn't spell out. Use
whystep 2 to pull the PR and commits. - Find the one fact it's safe because of. Most changes that look risky are safe because of a single fact, like "this call only drops already-dead cache entries and does nothing else". Find that fact. If it holds, most risky cases are cleared at once. Spend your time here, not on a long list of maybes.
- Look where grep stops. Read the source of the library you call, and check its pinned version and any local patch. Work out when things run: microtasks, unmount and teardown, Solid versus React. Follow what a symbol search misses: the JSON an API returns, a DB column, a wire format, another language reading the same bytes, a feature flag, code three hops downstream.
- Be honest about each risk. Give it a real chance of happening and a real cost if it does. Keep the risks you confirmed. List the ones you checked and cleared separately. Same rules as
why. Cite a realfile:line, a search that finds nothing is still an answer, and never make up a caller or an API. - Prove the one fact. Write a script or test that runs the real code, run it, and paste what happened.
- For a big or wide change, run it as an
arena. Ask more than one model the same question and merge the answers. Different models catch different real bugs.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago Changed 03f44dbf518c
- 26d ago Changed 5ae00d4f1ba5
- 1mo ago Changed · -1 lines · +26 tokens per session 67e2ff52fbec
- 1mo ago First seen · 51 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A f89d739a8703
blast-radius is a skill published in the GitHub repository michael-denyer/pstack-claude (3,082 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 87 tokens to every session and 961 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-review-excellence
Master effective code review practices to provide constructive feedback, catch bugs early, and foster knowledge sharing while maintaining team morale. Use when reviewing pull requests, establishing review standards, or mentoring developers.
multi-reviewer-patterns
Coordinate parallel code reviews across multiple quality dimensions with finding deduplication, severity calibration, and consolidated reporting. Use this skill when organizing multi-reviewer code reviews, calibrating finding severity, or consolidating review results.
ln-33-plan-reviewer
Reviews a concrete implementation plan for missing decisions, feasibility and risk before execution; read-only.
ln-52-delivery-reviewer
Reviews a completed change for acceptance, regressions and release risk; read-only, not a whole-codebase audit.
ln-41-surgical-change-implementer
Implements one scoped product feature or fix using existing contracts; not upgrades, performance tuning or establishing cross-cutting technical foundations.
ln-42-dependency-upgrader
Upgrades dependencies in reversible batches with version-specific compatibility and regression checks.